Is Marrying Your Cousin Actually Dangerous?

Do babies born between two cousins actually have a higher chance of having birth defects? Understanding basic genetic principles will help with this question.

Science Insider tells you all you need to know about science: space, medicine, biotech, physiology, and more.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Following is a transcript of the video:

What did Queen Victoria, Charles Darwin, and Albert Einstein have in common? They all married their first cousins. You’d think Darwin of all people would know better. After all, mating with a close relative passes on bad genes that lead to deadly genetic mutations, right?

Today marrying your first cousin is illegal in 24 US states. But for most of Western history, people had to marry whoever lived nearby, which oftentimes meant marrying within the extended family.

In fact, between 1650-1850, the average married couple was fourth cousins. So, they had the same great-great-great-grandparents.

Genetically speaking that means they shared 0.20% of their DNA. Not much when you compare it to third(0.78%), second(3.13%), and especially first cousins(12.5%). And, the more DNA you share, the greater the chance your offspring will have a genetic disease — like cystic fibrosis or sickle-cell anemia.

But here’s the thing: You don’t have to be sick in order to give your child a genetic disease.

Take cystic fibrosis. It’s caused by a defect in the CFTR gene. But you need two copies of the defective gene to actually get the disease. So, if you only have one defective copy, you’re unaffected. Instead, you’re what’s called a carrier.

Now, if one carrier mates with a non-carrier, there’s no risk of the kids getting sick. But when both parents carry a defective copy of CFTR, then the kids have a 25% chance of inheriting two copies of the gene and having the disease.

So to see how dangerous it is to marry your first cousin, we need to calculate the chances that two first cousins both carry a copy of the same genetic disease.

Since they share a set of grandparents, we’ll start there. Now it becomes a game of “what ifs”: What if both grandparents are carriers vs. just one? What if one of their children is a carrier vs. none at all? And what if those children marry other carriers, or not? It can get very complicated, very quickly.

But scientists have crunched the numbers and it turns out the risk that the cousins have a kid who inherits a genetic disease is 4-7%. For the general population, it’s 3-4%.

So, not a big deal right? Here’s the catch: That’s the odds for one genetic disease. But there are thousands that could be hiding in your family tree.

Plus, if your kids also marry their first cousins and their kids marry their first cousins it’s a recipe for disaster. Because instead of introducing new, potentially helpful genes into the family gene pool, you’re recycling the old — and possibly dangerous — ones.

Take Emperor Ferdinand I of Austria. His parents were first cousins twice over! And when he was born, he wasn’t especially healthy. So, as far as marrying your cousin is concerned, you shouldn’t make it a family tradition.

[harshthakur]

fun fact:science is quite interesting when u r not studying it for a test

[zuko]

"Doesn't matter, she still look good."

_-Albert Einstein 1969_

[oddmann]

"Cousin is relative"

-Albert Einstein

[maripal]

Royalty: We should keep our bloodline PURE!
Scientists: Purely disease-ridden

[Leonardo-hbfz]

Albert Einstein married his cousin Elsa









Even his marriage was relative

[Salmaniack]

Einstein took theory of relativity to a whole new level 😂.

[Imagine_sisyphus_happy]

“Well I don’t know about your cousin but marriage is dangerous”

[nhaulx]

"If she ain't blood related, she's free to be dated." - A cultured individual.

[Eltipoquevisteayer]

Now i understand why my grandparents married out of their villages, because each one was basically 1-2 extended families

[kkrishna]

Darwin was kind of person who'd probably married cousin to study child.

[piinkmochii]

"Marrying your first cousin is illegal in 24 US states"
*sees state isn't highlighted*
oof

[donotcareaboutmypicture]

why marry your cousin when there's about 7.7 bilions of people on earth..😅😅

[kylej]

Yeah, that’s why I went to the next state for a date. When your family has been in the same town for 150 years, watch out!

[favforsue]

I did research on my ancestors and along my father’s line his family lived in a small rural community. I saw SO MANY people with the same last name along the branches of my father’s family tree. My grandparents had the same last name. I am lucky I was born relatively normal, probably because he left that community and married a woman from another country. Fresh genes!

[Reed]

“Is it dangerous to reproduce with your cousin?” There I made the title more representative of the content. There’s a difference between marriage, and reproduction.

[meganmanzenares]

Me: *reads title*
Me: *s w e e t h o m e a l a b a m a*

[m.]

That’s interesting. This is the reason why in our Hindu culture we initially match kundali in which the GOTRA is matched, If it is same we are not allowed to marry because it indicates we belong to same extended family.

[thearchangel]

The actual truth is that we have been conditioned to be disgusted from marrying closed relatives more than what the actual results, but the chances that we all know someone whom got married their relative and had kids with no genetic problems, and we know plenty whom were from completely different parts and still had disabilities, are pretty high!

[babitferreira]

My cousins treat me like their sister, the idea of getting together with them it's SO GROSS

[inhobiswinecellar]

You’d think the stigma around 1st cousin marriage would decrease given the rise of technology. Like if two cousins can do genetic testing to see what genes they carry, they can decide if the pregnancy is worth the risk.