Chief defends Supreme Court's legitimacy

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

*Having two justices LIE under oath in confirmation hearings claiming abortion rights are a "super-precedent" and then proceed to gleefully strip away the 50 year precedent combined with one justice married to a leading insurrectionist yet refusing to recuse himself is a far far different thing than simply disagreeing with an opinion. How could you be so disingenuous John Roberts?*

always-ask-why