A Conversation with D. Y. Chandrachud LL.M. ’83, S.J.D. ’86, Chief Justice of India’s Supreme Court

preview_player
Показать описание
On October 21, the Harvard Law School Center on the Legal Profession hosted a conversation between D. Y. Chandrachud, chief justice of India’s Supreme Court, and David B. Wilkins, Lester Kissel Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Center on the Legal Profession, on the state of the legal profession and the role of the judiciary in India and around the world. Co-sponsored by the Lakshmi Mittal and Family South Asia Institute at Harvard University.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Basically he's a white person (british man) in an Indian Skin 😂

King_ofNight
Автор

CJI there are millions of cases are pending in Indian courts. Judges are being selected by recommendation not on merit based in India and there is 0%transparency on judges personal property and income. Any words on that? Indians are waiting back home. Please address these issues before you leave the CJI position. Happy holidays in the US.

gowildamit
Автор

Allowing Electoral bonds means legalizing bribery. The least we can do is to publish the list of donors with details of their donations. No one gives free money.

korathmathew
Автор

50 million cases pending and you are on World tour. Nice

mortisdeus
Автор

Honourable CJI started speaking from 13:35 onwards, thank me later

BanshanMarwein
Автор

Product of nepotism helped by his father's influence and judiciary coup d'etat through collegium . He will not agree for UPSC like exams for judges bcz his son appointment is due to come.

s.g
Автор

Gyan chidne se fursat mile to pending cases resolve kro milordu

kakun
Автор

Proud of you, CJI, we couldn't have had anyone better to lead our judicial system, may God guide you and bless you with great prudence.

viewtrendingvideos
Автор

The most biased and hypocrite CJI of our country. 😒

anuragmathur
Автор

Where were Ambedkarites when chandrachud said in a manner in which president had ultimate say in appointment of judges which we all know is not true . He is talking bs.

anshukumar
Автор

1.3 billion people having only 35 judges in the Supreme Court?? It should be at least 150. Why, India has no money to pay remunerations?? Also high court and local courts increase the judges 10 times. In India suit takes 10 years to resolve!! Keep some standards

Skumr_hivdD.
Автор

Talking of women in forces, How many women work in chandrachud's security ?Also when he talks about gay rights, Is he only talking about Hindus or across the board?

rajeev
Автор

CJI goes to the biggest woke capital of the world😂

kamakshiyadav
Автор

Indian Judiciary needs reforms, and he is the Chief Justice because his father too was a Justice in the Supreme Court.

dengxaoping
Автор

SUCH A INTRODUCTION …… SOMEONE IS SUFFERING FROM ATTENTION DEFICIENCY SYNDROME

anand
Автор

The woke CJI who learnt wokeism in Harvard and is showing up through our throats and asses, he needs to understand India is a civilizational state and not a nation state in its traditional sense

MrSudheen
Автор

Live Stream of the proceedings n other events by CJI are remarkable. On the hands the corruption in Higher judiciary n lower judiciary has to be stopped. The fresh graduates must have to be looked up. Number of new Courts should be opened to clear up the backlog. Number of judges should be increased. Govt is wasting money on the wrong projects, it should increase the Funding on judiciary’s work. Please gear up the action.

shawnbaj
Автор

At least judges are not involved in any type of crime.Can we ensure such a stringent criteria not to be involved in any criminal activities for politicians to be members of assemblies and house of people?Can we ask political parties not to give tickets to criminals?

Certainly we can't and if we can, it's not guaranteed whether they would listen us.At least our judiciary listen us.

Can we ask home ministry why they are delaying for months in forwarding name to president for appointment of judges despite of SC suggested names long time before.
Answer is NO.

And can we ask political parties to reveal the name of donors?
Hearing is going on this issue too.Being a voter it is our right to know how political parties are funded.

Indian judiciary is too evolving over time.And its good at least they are trying to get better by every means.

WandaVision
Автор

No wonder, the CJI's father was also CJI. Can't call it a coincidence in a country of 1.4 billion people.

ashutoshvyas
Автор

Worst CJI in the history of Indian Judiciary machinary, as far as Hindu side is concerned.

SumitBhise-esrk