Is AI more dangerous than nuclear weapons? | Yann LeCun and Lex Fridman

Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:

GUEST BIO:
Yann LeCun is the Chief AI Scientist at Meta, professor at NYU, Turing Award winner, and one of the most influential researchers in the history of AI.

PODCAST INFO:

SOCIAL:

[LexClips]

Guest bio: Yann LeCun is the Chief AI Scientist at Meta, professor at NYU, Turing Award winner, and one of the most influential researchers in the history of AI.

[khaledelsayed]

This arguments holds no water. It’s really saying that if you have a human versus a human no one will win….ridiculous

[paulristow]

"It's not going to be an event" ... until they try to unplug it.

[michellemcdonald]

Everyone a soldier just without the discipline and training; I imagine that would be both scary and dangerous.

[Pixelarter]

There's a chance your AI assistant won't be able to differentiate spam from real conversation, because the AI spammer will get so good that it's indifferentiable from desirable usage.

Then we would get chaos, and we may need to abandon remote communications because no remote message can be trusted.

Then reality may be trusted only if seen live from your own eyes, which would be a giant paradigm shift. *But only in case we don't adopt any AR glasses or brain implants.

[ismaelplaca]

Obviously, because AI will get a hold of nuclear weapons