6^2 ÷ 2(3) + 4 = ? Mathematician Explains The Correct Answer

preview_player
Показать описание
This math problem went viral on Twitter and I've seen a lot of debate about the answer. I explain why one interpretation is considered correct.

I studied Mathematics and Economics at Stanford. Press coverage of my work:

*I get many, many emails about this problem and am unable to reply to them.

Connect on social media. I update each site when I have a new video or blog post, so you can follow me on whichever method is most convenient for you.

My Books

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I consulted my son, who is a math major on this issue and he said, " It's a poorly written equation due to the ambiguity of it. No mathematician would write an equation like this." Problem solved!

rhondaweber
Автор

Another interpretation of "I saw the man with binoculars" is "I cut the man in half using a pair of binoculars to do so". Just saying.

tavismillard
Автор

This is where for division you’d just put it in a fraction, it clears up all ambiguity

michaeltanner
Автор

This is why I always use parentheses. Life is too short to argue over precedence.

UteChewb
Автор

If it can to be "interpreted", it is not a legitimate arithmetical expression, it is simply incomplete or lazy.

francis
Автор

Math is a language. If you can't write it properly, don't expect to be understood.

lolz
Автор

No mathematician divides like this, this is one of the reasons why every one use fraction when they are in higher maths.

Zer-zzxc
Автор

The moment when you can make out the apparently critical precedence rules, but fail at calculating 18*3...

noone
Автор

This shit is why I prefer fraction lines...

aaron
Автор

For me the correct one is 10. You can not just get rid of the brackets as you see fit in the given equation, nor add them when you want. The website, got rid of brackets around 3 which, as soon as it did that, changed the equation. Google on the other hand as far as i saw just added more so it can separate everything, which again shouldnt be done. The solution for me is 10 and i am sticking with it :D My reason and opinion: It would be like this: 6^2 *2(3) + 4. If i follow google i can add brackets here: (6^2/(2*3)) +4 which should equal 10. And for the website one it just put fractions and deleted the brackets which you shouldn't do, since you didn't solve the bracket. At least thats how i was thaught. So im sticking with 10 :D

NightyCore
Автор

I've been using math at least long enough to know that it doesn't take nearly as much effort to make the answer to an equation apparent as it does to make it obscure.

JKiler
Автор

I ran into this very type of problem a few days ago. Excel interprets it as 58. If you want the 2 and 3 together then in Excel you have to bracket around them forcing them to multiply first before dividing.

johnspathonis
Автор

is nobody going to address the fact that there's no equal sign in this "equation" making it an expression?

chunchan
Автор

It's not a amthematical problem. its a syntax problem. It's just written very ugly. It should be: 6^2 / (2 * 3) + 4 = 10 or (6^2 / 2) * 3 +4 = 58

AlexAegisOfficial
Автор

This goes against everything I was taught, PEMDAS

P - parentheses
E - exponents
M - multiplication
D - division
A - addition
S - subtraction

elimartin
Автор

If you properly use Pemdas, you would get 58. The parentheses first only applies to the inside of the parentheses so if there isn't anything to solve in the parentheses then it just acts like a normal number and if there is a number next to the parentheses where that would act like a multiply. The second is step in Pemdas is exponents. Third is multiply or divide, if even though multiply comes before divide in the Pemdas acronym they have the same priority and it would go left to right. This means you would do the divide by 2 before the multiply by 3. The forth and final step is add and subtract, the same priority rule on multiply and divide also applies to addition and subtraction.

shinobi
Автор

6^2 ÷ 2(3) + 4 = 36 ÷ 2(3) + 4 = 18(3) + 4 = 54 + 4 = 58. Why do people insist on using their own rules in math rather than simply by going by established standard order of operations. You can't assume that 2(3) is part of the "same term" as terms are separated by addition and subtraction signs, not implicit multiplication operators.

SteveMcRae
Автор

Correct answer, wrong method. There is no exception to the rule, parenthesis are always first. In this case it will be:

6^2 / 2 x (3) + 4
6^2 / 2 x 3 + 4
36 / 2 x 3 + 4
18 x 3 + 4
54 + 4
58

The only difference with the correct answer but wrong method on the video is I did parenthesis first. And that's how it should be.

raymendez
Автор

In terms of algebra, if you have an equation like 5 / 2a, you would consider 2a a single integer rather than 2 x a, therefore you would solve 2a first. This is why I believe 10 makes more sense in an equation like this.

Memorie
Автор

"PEMDAS" or whatever other shortcut you have learned states that with mulitpliplication and division, or addition and subtraction, you do whatever comes first when reading left to right.

P-Parentheses = There aren't any to solve, as the (3) has been solved
E-Exponents = 6^2 = 36
M/D- Muliplication/Division = 36/2 = 18, 18*3 = 54
A/S-Addition/Subtraction= 54+4 = 58

58.

SadieGoetsch