1. Immanuel Kant Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics

[Dalmato]

thankyou so much for the video . I appreciate it with all humbleness. Kant is a challenging philosophical figure. and your videos just make it easier for us to comprehend.

[Deleuzeshammerflow]

I'm sure you spend a lot of time researching and preparing these videos and they truly show. I've gotten something out of each one of your series.

[joyuhbxtch]

Thank you for this. Saved my life my philosophy class is so to me.

[magentacyan]

You did a great job breaking it down! I'm trying to write a paper explaining Kant's critique of Hume. I've watched all 23 videos you posted but my brain didn't hold on to it long enough so here I go again.

[Chamerlengo]

I'm very grateful for these videos! I am writing a paper on Kant describing why he is a pivotal figure in modern philosophy and succeeded in his metaphysical and epistemological projects.

[Deleuzeshammerflow]

THANK YOU! You are the bridge spanning my numerous intellectual abstractions.

[drjasonjcampbell]

@soultorment27 Kant was Absolutely...a Genius! (Best philosopher hands down).

[marketasadilova]

Very well explained and as an added bonus, Dr. Campbell is so cute! =)

[jenslyn]

Thanks for these great videos! It's different way to learn some very interesting stuff... I can even browse around while learning :-)

[jeredmccorkle]

Wonderful, I'm reading the Critique right now, after having read the Prolegomena--which is probably the opposite unfortunately of what Kant would have intended. Nevertheless, this video is succinct, and I think it's wonderful to find a video on youtube dealing with metaphysics.

[nihalstic]

Clear e concise, excellente communication

[drjasonjcampbell]

Try to make unique contributions. to be first is to put everything on the line. but I checked my ego at the door the day I decided to go public. Hopefully others will add content as well.thanks for watching :-)

[yumiyukishiro]

Thank you so much for doing this video!! I am preparing my exams to access university, and I will take an exam about de prolegomena...unfortunately I have only had one our lesson and I am quite lost, not to mention the difficulty of the understanding of the text...I will have to analyze a paragraph....Thank you so much, this is so useful!! I wish you were my teacher :)
PS: I cannot find the video about the "a priori", even if I have downloaded your outline.

[drjasonjcampbell]

a bridge. i like the sound of that. :-) peace

[Dalmato]

you are the only one to make this video.

[kennydobbs]

A few questions for you Kantians. If knowledge can exist a priori and not be dependent on empirical observation and evidence, how does such knowledge subsist? Pure mathematical reason, and indeed, any knowledge relies on an intelligent mind to abstract it. If there is knowledge which is exists a priori to empiricism, how does such knowledge exist? For someone such as a Scholastic Metaphysician this is not a problem, this knowledge exists in a Necessary Intellect, which we call God. For someone who denies the existence of a necessary intellect, this seems like a very confounding situation to be in, as we have these truths which are universal and indeed necessary but seemingly do not have a source of their subsistence other than our own finite and unnecessary intellects. Why did Kant deny the ability to come to the conclusion of God through metaphysics if he concluded that metaphysical knowledge is a priori and non-empirical?

[drjasonjcampbell]

this is really all I have at this time. Hope it helps.