Response to 'DEBUNKED: Top 5 'Climate Change' Myths' by Louder with Crowder

Thanks to those who alerted me to this video. I decided to do a rebuttal because the "5 myths" included on Crowder's website included one that I had been wanting to address for a while: That 'manmade' CO2 only comprises 4% of the CO2 released every years, the rest being natural.
But it turned out this claim wasn't one of the "5 myths" Crowder transferred to video, for some reason. But I thought, what the Hell, I'll debunk his nonsense anyway.

SOURCES:

"Mass gains of the Antarctic ice sheet exceed losses" Zwally et al. (Journal of Glaciology 2015)

"A high resolution record of Greenland mass balance" -- McMillan et al. (Geophysical Research Letetrs, 2016)

"The hidden meltdown of Greenland" -- NASA, 2015

"Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global warming hiatus," Karl et al. (Science 2015)

Sources for the credentials of John Coleman and Tim Ball can be found in my video "Meet the Scientists"

10:45 -- "The Unchained Goddess" 1958

11:20 and 12:39 -- Japan Meteorological Agency

11:30 Solar activity vs temp graph from CPSG101 Science and Global Change First Year Colloquium II Climatology 401: "Climate Forcings & Why Climates Change" Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.

11:33 -- "World ocean heat content and thermosteric sea level change (0–2000 m), 1955–2010" Levitus et al, GRL 2012

12'40" "CO2-forced climate thresholds during the Phanerozoic" -- D. Royer, Geochimica 2006

12:52 graph showing correlation of CO2 and temp over Phanerozoic from: "Geocarb III: A revised model of atmospheric CO2 over Phanerozoic time" -- R. Berner and Z. Kothavala, American Journal of Science, Feb 2001

12:56 The solar output graph is from James Imamura, University of Oregon Dept of physics

13:27 -- "CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate" -- D. Royer et al, GSA Today, March 2004

[EeekiE]

You can keep your posh microphone, fancy back drop, desk props and loud ego. Nothing beats a calm and informed smack down from a real science journalist equipped with the ability to read and use MSPaint.

[ZDWario]

You made a lot of good points, but he talked very loudly so I think I gotta go with Crowder on this one.

[ChipArgyle]

Why is it people turn their noses up at Wikipedia as a reliable source of information but will accept what they find in blogs and vlogs without question?

[tbroschat]

I was totally with you until you called Steven Crowder an "intelligent man"

[pezzamange]

Don't you just love when people try to disprove a theory they don't even understand?

[smittywerbenjaegermanjense]

Crowder is only marginally relevant because of the whole anti-SJW thing. Capitalizing on that is what gave him a sizeable fanbase of people who seem to think he's remotely intelligent. What you see here is pretty representative of the quality of his argumentation. Those of us who remember the WI union strikes a few years ago know this.

[cloudyxpillow]

"Talking louder doesn't mean you're better informed", Potholer54 If only more people understood this

[asteroidrules]

"Derogatory and unscientific" is a pretty good description of Crowder as a whole.

[drmadjdsadjadi]

If you do not want the government to impose a solution to a problem, you STILL need to accept the science that the problem exists and then come up with a non-government solution that can work.

[potholer]

+Mark Bernard -- You have disabled the "reply" button to your comments, thus prohibiting people from exercising their right to reply. This is against the rules of my channel. Please re-post, this time allowing a response. Thanks.

[Volteer]

Comments: "You're showing me science that supports the 'leftist' side of science, therefore you obviously have a leftist agenda and are a leftist"

FFS why do Americans continue to believe that science has a political agenda? Why is it so hard to accept that science needs to be viewed outside of a political opinion sphere, as this video completely does?

[DahVoozel]

You will never change Crowder's mind so long as people give him money to spout anti-science bs.

[SljmD]

The biggest myth in this video is when potholer says that Crowder is an intelligent man.

[orochi]

This is what happens when Crowder's sources are checked.

[scotthunt]

In one of Crowder's anti-climate change videos somebody claimed that peer review is meaningless or inaccurate or something, so I wrote a comment explaining the peer review process, then to my surprise, Crowder himself actually replied to my comment and told me that "peer review is a circle jerk between left wing biased scientists" and "peer review sentenced Galileo Galilei to house arrest". What the fuck does that even mean?

[QT]

Anyone who thinks Steven Crowder knows what he's talking about is not very well informed.

[neillaldegheri]

You just scientifically destroyed his loud, political, pseudoscientific gibberish. Meticulously. Surgically I dare say. Thank you so much. With respect and admiration. In times when science is being questioned by loud, uneducated TV addicts, your videos are a welcome source of logic and information. Please keep it up!

[MuslimGoku]

You beat Crowder worse than he beats elderly union workers.

[Ian_sothejokeworks]

I was once taking a class with this Professor who believed that the Earth was warming, and that it was due largely to a rise in CO2, but did not believe that Mankind was responsible in any way. I remember someone in my class asked him, "You know that there are some scientists who do NOT accept that the Earth is getting warmer?" The professor answered in the affirmative. That person then asked, "Why do you think they refuse to accept that, when you know it to be true?" The professor said, "Well, I assume that they haven't read the data, or they haven't come to the right conclusions. I don't know why some people refuse to accept obvious truths." The student replied, "Neither do I.", and walked out of the class. Fun day.

[CoolHandLuke]

I very distinctly remember watching this video a few years ago. I was a big Crowder fan at the time. You showed me that Crowder blatantly lied about all of these points. I continued to watch more Crowder but with skepticism and eventually came to the conclusion that Crowder and all his right wing buddies are grifters. Now I'm hoping Bernie stays healthy enough for one more run for president. Thank you sir for changing my entire view of the world, I really can't thank you enough.