Closing arguments to begin tomorrow in trial of killing of Ahmaud Arbery

preview_player
Показать описание
The closing arguments follow roughly two weeks of testimony in the trial.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Self defense??? They chased him down like an animal and killed him.

FreePalestine
Автор

How do you feel threatened....when you have a gun, and your the ones in a pickup trucks in pursuit of a person with no weapon. Make that make sense.

vitathervil
Автор

Great, I can wait to see these people go to prison . Self defence is a ridiculous argument, 1 he was un-armed and 2 they were chasing HIM not the other way around . This one will be an amazing victory against the horrible people and I hope they get life .

davidhaney
Автор

He was murdered because he fought for his life.

Cowards wouldn't understand.

emersonmanning
Автор

*Okay, so their INSANE logic is:* there were a few non consecutive petty crimes that took place around this neighborhood. The crimes had very little to absolutely no relation to me, but there’s a black man running around here and who peeked inside a construction scene at night once. IMMA GET MY GUN, MY SON, MY TRUCK AND HUNT HIM DOWN, just because I can!
Meanwhile COPS & DA(s): You hunted down and murdered an unarmed man because he peeked inside SOMEONE ELSE’S place!?!?
Yeah, no… that makes complete sense because YOU SAID IT WAS SELF DEFENSE, RIGHT? 😉

greyson
Автор

They had no business bothering that young man. This was never about trespassing on their property from day one. This was all about they hated the fact he was jogging in the community. Ahmaud was the one in fear for his life who had three evil thugs chasing him.

iamv
Автор

It should be interesting. The prosecutors should be able to craft a compelling closing argument. They have a lot of details.

TheGoodwinlive
Автор

Has prosecution presented their closing arguments yet? I only saw part of the defense closing.

hectornegron
Автор

Pull that Kyle verdict b's if y'all want to 😒we'll see what happens

friendoftheshow
Автор

Lol. The guy that shot him admitted that he didn't threaten them. Lol

deedeem
Автор

Self defense means he was chasing them with shotgun and pistol.

warka
Автор

Can’t wait to hear what malarkey the defense tries to claim. I’ll get some 🍿ready for that 💩show.

HeatherRose
Автор

Let’s see how far we’ve come, or how far WE as a people have fallen.✨🕊✨

strights
Автор

Let's review the evidence
Neighborhood crime level: low
Knowledge/sighting of burglary: none
Right to question the victim: none
Danger presented by victim: none

oversol
Автор

He was simply out for a run. My God, if that isn't the biggest lie ever told.

buyerofsorts
Автор

The McMichaels are the ones dealing with the "shooting" aspect in this case. I totally disagree on why "it is one's duty to bear witness a crime" with William (Roddy) Bryant. If he is found guilty then I'll have to check "skin color" for me to get further involved even in traffic accidents I bear witness to my "driver's manual for license I thought taught!?" 🤔 If a black person gets in a traffic accident, if I witness the accident to a police officer, I will now be charged for making the black person in fear of my following vehicle causing him to crash all the way to the person I got in an accident with is white the witness is white it was a "race color conspiracy card that can now be played via this case if not overuled by the Supreme Court!?" 🤔 Hmmm!? The person is not my skin color ... Ignore any duty to "bear witness" rights only given to "Freedom of the Press" where you must prove you are "press!?" 🤔😬

lawrencejelsma