BREAKING! NASA Selects Blue Origin for Next Lunar Lander

preview_player
Показать описание
BREAKING! NASA Selects Blue Origin for Next Lunar Lander
#NASA #Artemis #LunarLander

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
OUR MISSION: Our mission is to inform and inspire the explorers of tomorrow; because we believe that space is better together.

SUPPORT OUR WORK: Consider becoming a TLP Member on Patreon or Youtube!

Donations/Super chat over $20 please use GoFundMe

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
CONNECT WITH US:

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
GIVEAWAY RULES:
No Purchase Necessary. Purchase/donation does not enhance chance of winning. Void where prohibited or restricted by law. Valid only during the live broadcast.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Given Blue Origins record, we won't see it well until after 2050

peterlutz
Автор

I dont mind what they choose
Whatever works works!
Because as you say
*Space is better together*

seantaggart
Автор

very clever to hide the ladder on the other side of the lander, photo seems to show ladder going to bottom of lander where the engines are located however i really hope everything works out.

arnoldsmith
Автор

On LC-36 launch tower neeted rebuild for installing crew acsess arm for New Glenn. Will been six arms on KSC: LC-40, LC-39A (Falcon 9), LC-39B (SLS), LC-39C (Starship), LC-41 (Atlas V, Dream Chaser, Vulcan), and LC-36 (New Glenn).

av_kovko
Автор

So reward Boeing while it struggles to launch a human rated Really?

patrickjudd
Автор

Friendly competition with ultimate cooperation will see it through.

lindencoleman
Автор

Elon will be monitoring Blue Origin's progress from Mars.

jamesemerson
Автор

They did not explain where is the main rocket engine on this lander.
I am guessing it is at the bottom of the bottom under the crew module but it is not visible in the artwork does anyone know. ?

stephenhumble
Автор

So the engines are in the crew compartment which they now put on the bottom? But they are dead on about hydrogen. We need to develop robust H2 handling. Because it's everywhere in the soalr system and will be the fuel for NTRs.

julianwells
Автор

Good Lord, the Phone Audio blew up on the pad! 🤣

jameswilson
Автор

Can any billionaire apply to nasa for funding and not provide any results?

jrtUfhevz
Автор

So far, Blue Origin has managed to get a small capsule to 50klm a few times. Now it's grounded after a failure. At that rate they will land on the Moon by 2050 but don't bet on it.

grumblewoof
Автор

How much? .... - sorry, I didn't hear that question. LOL

JohnJTraston
Автор

H e s p e a k s s o o s l o w. I l o s t i n t e r e s t. Bye.

HenkvanHoek
Автор

Yeah that hilarious blue origin would be like 2040 at earliest so many delays its just hilarious bet you million its gonna be delayed so much they will be withdrawn from it it will happen

M_Lopez_D_Artist
Автор

Looks like a "space race" between Space X & NASA/Blue Origin. Here is a little comparison
SpaceX Starship : Expected to be operational in two yrs (or less). Can go to the moon once a month (weekly later on) Reusable vehicles. Cost 10 million$ per mission per customer.
NASA STS Artimas : Expected to be operational in two yrs (or more) Can go to the moon once a year. One mission, one rocket. Cost to the taxpayers 4.1 BILLION per mission
SpaceX Starship : 21st Century Rocket design & mindset.
NASA STS Artimas :20th Century design & mindset
Whom do you think will be the "winner" at the end of the race? Hint: EM

WG-tthk
Автор

dude nooo :/
SpaceX could get the job done a lot faster and cheaper

OtherworldlyYTP
Автор

First !!! NASA should start by retiring
this 115 year old guy, nasa needs new blood... can we get Space X to do the job ?? Please!!! 🤦

pedrocruz
Автор

Daniel Newman​ Oh I wish I were there. Love the food I'm in Florida 🙏🦩🌺🌴

nancybaldonado