Ryzen 5 9600X vs Core i5 14600K - Test in 10 Games

preview_player
Показать описание
Ryzen 5 9600X vs Core i5 14600K l 1080p

Use coupon code and get discount - TG3

Ad - 0:00
Games :
The Witcher 3 - 0:06
Starfield - 0:55
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:46
Forza Horizon 5 - 2:43
Ghost of Tsushima - 3:40
PUBG - 4:28
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 5:20
Hogwarts Legacy - 6:11
Horizon Forbidden West - 7:06

System:
Windows 11
MSI MPG X670E CARBON
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The test was conducted on an old version of windows and locked tdp at 65 watts, because of this the performance of the ryzen processor may be lower, see my new tests for more accurate data!!!
Games :
The Witcher 3 - 0:06
Starfield - 0:55
CS2 - 1:46
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 2:37
Forza Horizon 5 - 3:34
Ghost of Tsushima - 4:32
PUBG - 5:20
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 6:12
Hogwarts Legacy - 7:03
Horizon Forbidden West - 7:58


System:
Windows 11
MSI MPG X670E CARBON

TestingGames
Автор

All that bad press about Intel made me regreat buyng my 13700k on the beginning of the last year... now, one and half year later i'm getting happier with my purchase. LOL.

evomichel
Автор

Me: "Hi, I need to buy a cooler for my new CPU."
Store Employee: "Okay. Do you know how much power it uses?"
Me: "Exactly 88 watts."

selohcin
Автор

If you are primarily Gaming Ryzen with x3D is only way to go.. None of 9000 Series without x3d are worth getting..

davidcole
Автор

Why was this new CPU even made. There's nothing that can be considered a "real generational improvement"...

AlkoholOgerLeonElektronik
Автор

O wow. Expected AMD to improve their results after 2 years. I guess Arrow Lake is gonna clean sweep it.

TalonsTech
Автор

Disappointing results. Wait for 9800X3D vs 7800X3D. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Jakiyyyyy
Автор

Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X are both insanely disappointing. They should've upped the clocks, because they probably can, instead of focusing on efficiency.

shadowlemon
Автор

i dont understand the hate against intel. Its literally better

akkyura
Автор

I don't get it. They all say AMDs are perfect for gaming. Yet here we are....dollar to dollar...the 9600X got beaten on every games....

hetasaputra
Автор

😮Wtf 14600K is winning and efficient also

animeland
Автор

Amd now playing like intel now, they will see the same fate

GamingFver
Автор

I think you need to redo this test, if there is a malfunction with MSI afterburner not showcasing the core power for Ryzen section then we can't know this comparison as it's impossible for all those games for the consumption to be all at 88. Looking forward to another test or also with 9700x

archvile
Автор

the issue actually is not affecting i5 series... still affordable

arch.__t
Автор

Some people have noticed the power draw locked to 88W under any varying load, which questions whether the bios is allowing the proper power to the CPU? Might explain the poor launch performance considering AMD was planning on raising the TDP to 120W some months back.

Brave_Chaotic
Автор

could you share the link to the latest video of the 14600k vs 9600x with the tdp change then mate...

therpp
Автор

If you want to play games just buy i5. That's a fact.

Lookingformorefun
Автор

you might be the last real benchmarker in Youtube, was very disappointed to see Linus use fake benchmarks in his latest video, probably got paid a shit-ton by AMD

JohnWick-
Автор

Almost all CPUs from last year and this one are pretty disappointing. 😅 I think I'll wait another year to get a new computer

jonhattanrai
Автор

It would be perfect, if you will add the average fps/w scale at the end of every test. For example, Starfield 1.1 fps/w for intel and 1.26 fps/w for AMD, 6.6 and 6.7 for CS2, 3.2 and 3.1 for PUBG and so on.

playbackstorage
join shbcf.ru