Stephen Wolfram responds to a STRONG CRITIQUE by Lawrence Krauss

#pangburn #physics #wolfram #krauss

Official Pangburn Facebook Page: @PangburnInspire
Official Pangburn Twitter: @TeamPangburn

Follow Trav here:
Facebook: @ThePangburn
Twitter: @ThePangburn
Instagram: @thepangburn

[Pangburn]

Consider subscribing if you enjoy the content ✌

[jyjjy]

That was a STRONG CRITIQUE? I don't even know if I would call it one, or rather if it is one it's the weakest possible; "I, and the other physicists, don't agree with you", essentially.

[clarkdavidson]

Rad clip. Stephen had an attitude of 'f off lawrence'

[SpotterVideo]

The following proves Spinor Theory is correct.

Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: "A theory that you can't explain to a bartender is probably no damn good." Ernest Rutherford

When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons.

Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?

Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons

. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process.

Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.

[KaliFissure]

Anyone who doesn't recognize that this project is one of the most interesting experiments in computation ever doesn't understand it. It will reach into philosophy and sociology as well.

[BanshanMarwein]

Pretty cool conversation guys. Keep rocking buddy

[jasonbuksh]

Wolfram will only get credibility when his stuff starts predicting stuff we don’t know about - until then it’s clever word soup

[uiuctalkshow]

To learn more Wolfram thoughts on about college, AI, and the Computational Universe. Watch our interview with him.

[maxwelldillon]

We're still waiting for novel testable predictions.

[Constantinesis]

For me Wolfram Physics Model is how Physics and reality works. All the classic fundamental physics are actually a valid interpretation of his model, not agasint it.

[rajeevgangal]

Lawrence is right. This mountain of ideas is build on thin foundations. Mathematica and Wolfram Alpha are good. That does not automatically mean Wolfram has it right in claims made about hypergraphs