Why Illegal Immigrants Can Attend Public School | Plyler v. Doe

In episode 26 of Supreme Court Briefs, illegal immigrants get kicked out of public schools in Tyler, Texas and a local district starts charging them to attend school there because they're illegal.

Produced by Matt Beat. Music by Jermaine Hysten. All images found in public domain or used under fair use guidelines.
Photos credits:
Pax Ahimsa Gethen
Noah Scialom

Sound effect credits:
Punch sound effect by Mike Koenig

Check out cool primary sources here:

Other sources used:

Tyler, Texas
1975

Under the leadership of James Plyler, the Tyler Independent School District begins charging $1,000 a year for unauthorized immigrant students to attend school there. It had justified this decision by a recent Texas law that said it wouldn’t use taxpayer money to educate students who were not “legally admitted” into the United States. Not only that, the law said school districts could deny students enrollment if their parents couldn’t prove they were legal citizens.

And that’s exactly what the Tyler Independent School District started doing. In fact, in 1977 it began kicking kids out of school if they didn’t have United States birth certificates.

In response, four families affected by this new policy sued the school district. The district court, which, in order to protect their privacy identified them using pseudonyms, decided that the kids should be allowed to go to school and found both the state law and the school district’s policy unconstitutional. They argued the law and policy went against the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. The school district appealed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit agreed with the lower court.

The district appealed to the Supreme Court, and the Court agreed to hear the case, combining it with a similar case, weirdly called Texas v. Certain Named and Unnamed Alien Child. By golly that could be a great band name, come to think of it.

Anyway, the Court heard oral arguments on December 1, 1981. The Court had a difficult time with this one, and wouldn’t announce its decision until June 15, 1982. In a 5-4 decision, they sided with the families, and struck down the Texas law that withheld funds from educating students who were illegal aliens. The Court argued that illegal aliens and their children, even though they weren’t citizens were still people, who deserved the same rights as protected under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Because they viewed education as a right, and because they weren’t hurting the state that much by going to school, the Court said these students should be able to go.

Leading the dissent was Justice Burger, who argued it wasn’t the judicial system’s place to solve this issue, but that it ought to be solved through the legislative process. This might surprise some, but the dissent actually said these kids should be able to go to school. They just argued the Constitution didn’t allow them to decide on this.

With all the debate today about DACA, or the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, the immigration policy that lets the children of illegal aliens not get kicked out of the country among other things, Plyler v. Doe is an extremely relevant case. Today, school administrators in K-12 public schools can’t even ask about a child’s immigration status. Notice how I said K-12. Post secondary schools can still have restrictions based on citizenship status.
Years later, James Plyler, the superintendent who fought these families who wanted their undocumented kids to attend school, who in fact this case was named after, changed his mind. On the 25th anniversary of the decision, in 2007, Plyler said that Texas law that withheld funds from educating students who were illegal aliens “would have been one of the worst things to happen in education - they’d cost more not being educated. Right after we let those youngsters in, I was pleased.”

[iammrbeat]

My book about everything you need to know about the Supreme Court is now available!

[TheLeagueOfTasteAndClassCorp]

When are the Certain Named & Unnamed Alien Child going to be releasing their debut album? (I'm looking at you Mr. Beat to make this happen)

[CityBeautiful]

I think some people forget that undocumented people still pay taxes, so they are paying for those schools. It's not like immigrants are coming and free riding on services like schools.

[just_jon]

I love all these Supreme Court vids! Speaking of education, can you do a video explaining Fisher v Texas pts 1 & 2 and all the related affirmative action cases?

[blueseanomad]

"Certain Named & Unnamed Alien Child" is an underground band. Because, you know, "Doe" is too mainstream.

[cubsfan]

isn't weird how the dissenting justices when they lose say something like "the court shouldn't be deciding this" lol

[KnowingBetter]

Was Tyler SD the only school district in Texas to actually start enforcing this law? The case makes it seem that way since there was a two year gap between the law passing and enforcement... That would be a little weird.

Also, I obviously agree with the court on this one

[eldagarcia-bravo]

Thank you for this video! I'm studying for my bilingual education exam, and one of the competencies requires me to know the history of bilingual education. Your video was very helpful

[russellstern]

I love your briefs. Would you be able to go back and include the year in the title of each video in your Supreme Court Briefs series? Thank you.

[redrakan]

Hey Mr. Beat I love your videos and I'm studying to become a history teacher myself. Anyway you could make a Supreme Court brief on Burwell v. Hobby Lobby?

[undolf]

You telling me the “entire” court agreed non-citizens are entitled to public education?

[iammrbeat]

Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision? How do you feel about DACA?

[JacksonPriceSonder]

Honestly didn’t really agree with the decision until I heard boul say ‘it would cost more to not let them go to school’ made me see it from a different angle

[dancingzorbas]

Very relevant case, thank you for posting

[mummyneo]

I think that immigrants should not be kicked out of schools and that that the court was right in this decision!Great video Mr Beat!

[TheVistastube]

Notification squad! But seriously, as a Non Resident legal Alien, I'm thankful for this channel and it's amazing content. This is useful ( some would say necessary) information.

[SputnikRX]

Why were they not just deported. How were any of these people there long enough to even send kids to school

[jaypatel]

Children were not at fault for parents illegal action and thus they should still be allowed to attend the school. The parents however have no right to claim equal protection because that right applies to citizens only. They were not citizens and so this is judicial activism by the courts.

[Khasidon]

Very good video, and again very informative. It’s even interesting to a law student from Denmark :D

[amam]

*sees thumbnail*
Hey, I know that school logo on graduation toga. It's from Claret School in Manila. Cheers from PHL, Mr. Beat.