RC planes CRASH COMPILATION #2 | 4K

preview_player
Показать описание
00:00 Letov LF-107 Luňák, EPP RC glider
00:48 North American Rockwell OV-10 Bronco, wingspan 2,55m
01:50 de Havilland Canada DHC-2 Beaver, wingspan 2,8m
02:30 Hawker Sea Fury, wingspan 2,6m
04:10 Smith DSA-1 Miniplane, scale RC biplane
04:49 Bristol Type 138, wingspan 3,2m
05:30 Albatros D.III Oeffag, wingspan 2,82m
06:07 SPAD S.XIII, wingspan 2,99m
07:05 RC triplane Fokker Dr.I, wingspan 1,2m
08:22 REBEL, sport jet RC airplane
11:25 PZL-104 Wilga 35, wingspan 3,95m
13:27 Pelikán 1950, wingspan 2,6m, Class TEXACO
14:06 Schleicher Ka-4 Rhönlerche II, wingspan 1,7m

#RCcrash #crash
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Exciting and fun to watch at the same time sad at the loss and damage to some beautiful models. Been there done that

PigParts
Автор

Scale pilots never disappoint on delivering pilot error mishaps. In order to learn to fly in iffy wind conditions you have to... fly often in windy conditions. RATHER then stay home and build get out your beater sport plane out on a crappy windy days and master the needed skills THEN you'll be better prepared on Scale Show day when the wind is up.

asommer
Автор

Some beautiful planes some questionable flying, but 95% of the hobbyists went home with their planes in one piece. The worst part of the whole thing was the replays and a soundtrack that reminded me of a 3 ring circus. There were some beautiful planes that showcased the artistry of the builders.

craigroberson
Автор

Yea good vid but expecting to see Clint Eastwood to appear over hedge with that spaghetti western music in the first half.😅

ianbargh
Автор

The replays are really annoying, other than that. Good video.

ElijahMiniBikes
Автор

Some lovely models... Shame people don't, can't or won't practice crosswind landings. Don't think there was one stable approach in the entire video 😱

EAGLEFLYER
Автор

Sad to see so many pilots don't know how to are either too high, too fast, or both....and none can figure out that its easier to go around and try again, as most just force the aircraft onto the have more money than brains

hardtop
Автор

A stabilized approach is usually the solution to most landing problems.

enriquekramer
Автор

Most of these pilots should buy a flightsim and spend one winter and practise basic skills of RC flying
Its a shame to ruin such a nice planes for pilot errors...

juharahkonen
Автор

Bugga those lower wind turbulence 🙃...beautiful planes !!! 😁😎

deanedeane
Автор

Sorry, but some comments sound like "know it all" people. -But, I was interested in the Sea-Fury, and the Fokker DR1 Sequency. One hint: the Sea-Fury needs a CG of 25 % from the front of the wing ( I fly the Fury myself). The Fokker probably needs a twist of 2 or 3 degrees negative. I don't know the english word, in German the Twist of the Wing is called: " FlächenSCHRÄNKUNG".

joachimschott
Автор

The Ventures style music is a great touch.

rooms
Автор

Thanks.

*Let the Sunshine in...*
.

secularsunshine
Автор

Wonderful models here, especially the Bristol. Exceptional. Some unfortunate manoeuvres though.

andyhofmann
Автор

The Fokker again: the CG should be placed further Forward.

joachimschott
Автор

At 13.07 minutes the plane has its ailerons full to the left and not to the right, which it should do with crosswind...just a bit more practice landing.😉

Around 1975 I was an RC flying instructor near a model airfield near Amsterdam (Netherlands) with, among other things, a Piper J3 with a 35cc Moki engine, but also a delta wing (from Graupner) with a 6.5cc WEBRA speed engine on the back and reached speeds of 250 km p/h.

BXgek
Автор

Ahoj, jenom drobnost, první větroň není LF-109 Pionýr ale LF-107 Luňák

pavelweiss
Автор

Too much replays and too much great planes for too much bad pilots.😊

mtuwksc
Автор

In almost every incident, it was simply a case of the ground suddenly 'jumping' up.

nighthawk
Автор

If actual planes had the same statistical probability of failure there would be a lot more trains today. 🤣

debunkthejunk