Which is better Engine design?? #engine #mechanical #mechanism #solidworks #3ddesign #combustion

A rotary conventional combustion engine, also known as a rotary engine or Wankel engine, is a type of internal combustion engine that uses a unique rotary design to generate power. Unlike traditional piston engines, which use reciprocating motion, rotary engines employ a spinning triangular rotor housed in an epitrochoidal-shaped chamber.

The key components of a rotary engine include the rotor, housing, and eccentric shaft. The rotor has three curved sides, creating three combustion chambers. As the rotor rotates within the housing, the chambers pass through the intake, compression, combustion, and exhaust phases. This continuous rotation eliminates the need for reciprocating pistons and valves.

One advantage of a rotary engine is its high power-to-weight ratio. Due to its compact size and lightweight construction, rotary engines can produce substantial power relative to their size. They also offer smooth operation due to the rotational motion, resulting in reduced vibration.

However, rotary engines are known for their high fuel consumption and emissions compared to traditional piston engines. The combustion process in a rotary engine is less efficient, resulting in lower fuel economy. Additionally, the design poses challenges in achieving efficient sealing of the combustion chambers, leading to potential oil consumption and emissions issues.

Despite these limitations, rotary engines have found applications in certain niche markets, such as sports cars and aircraft. Mazda is particularly renowned for its successful implementation of rotary engines in production vehicles.

In conclusion, a rotary conventional combustion engine is a unique type of internal combustion engine that utilizes a rotary design with a spinning rotor. While it offers advantages such as compactness and smooth operation, it also faces challenges regarding fuel consumption and emissions.

These animations are made using Solidworks software. Solidworks can be used for following prposes:

Solidworks modeling
Solidworks assembly
Solidworks drawing
Solidworks sketching
Solidworks design
Solidworks simulation
Solidworks sheet metal
Solidworks 3D printing
Solidworks surface modeling
Solidworks rendering
Solidworks animation
Solidworks CAD
Solidworks part modeling
Solidworks parametric design
Solidworks features
Solidworks constraints
Solidworks toolbox
Solidworks electrical
Solidworks weldments
Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical Mechanism
3D Design Software
3D Models free Download
solidworks tutorial for mechanical engineering
mechanical engineering course
Solidworks tutorial

[hanfo]

moving spark plug is more difficult to provide with power, would prefer second

[harshkumarmechanicalengg]

2nd design because this design saw rhe minimum parts. So this is connected for many engines and required less space😊😊

[elce]

the sparkplug be having the best rollercoaster ride on the 1st

[JimCGames]

On A I don’t understand how a spark plug will fire when it is rotating around as any wire connected to it would get tangled around the mechanical components driving the unit.

So B is better because A is impossible.

[johanngm]

2.looks better without being able to understand the purpose. Continuous mvt. Les complicated

[arturbaginski]

That was the first engine I have designed when I was about 10-12y old, I wouldn't be surprised somebody has patented it as many other people could have the same idea. The general concept is not the worst (although I got bunch of much better engines (totally different design and general running principles), but there is a lot to do with this particular one - it can be easily omproved.
You got here too much accelerating/decelerating mass and few other issues that may not be too obvious (I'll keep them for myself as I got some exceptionally good solutions that I perhaps may want to implement in some of my designs).

[sullysigl]

Looking at the dynamic principles of both, I realize that you are not going to get a full, and total honest answer about any of this, because there is no basis to begin from.

[Dr.Sinbei]

1 much better n minim fuel consumption

[Fastthings]

Second one has 6 Chambers while the first has 4 while being more compact

[YourAverageCringeYoutuber]

Both of these engines look like they wouldn’t even work. I’ll just stick with a normal Engine, or a Wankel engine if I’m feeling special

[TheDieselguy]

The i4, i6, v8, v6, v4, v or parallel twin, and even the single is better, but you didn’t give us a good option

[HabbAchmad-rcbl]

اعتمادا على ، ما الذي نستخدم المحرك من أجله ..؟

[crusadebirb]

Non of them is any good too many moving parts, too much friction, too complicated. Cool on paper but reality wouldn’t agree

[Rolly]

2 using centrifugal force less fule smoother running, 1 if breaking rocks 🪨 😂,

[kajtusczarodziej]

żywotność i to jak bardzo jest skomplikowane zamienia ten projekt w gowno

[sgarage]

What in the fuck are these engine designs 😂

[custom.]

They are both crap.... to overcomplecated, to many moving parts what equals in a fuck ton of problems soon.


And why invent the wheel new when there is already existing, better ones out there...

[Jack]

Bruh why this sound and 2 wouldnt work but 1 would