Tribunal Justice: Three judges, one verdict

preview_player
Показать описание
The new courtroom program, now streaming on Amazon Freevee was created by Judge Judy Sheindlin and has three times the justice.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I love the new show. And glad Byrd is back!

mistiinseattle
Автор

Is that Byrd I see oh how I havw missed his face & glad to see he's got a new gig with some amazing judges.

melissatodd
Автор

I love this show BUT todays episode was about someone having empty cans of gasoline in their garage. The judge argued that nobody has this item in their garage. We are Latinos and my stepdad ALWAYS had gas empty containers in the garage “just in case” he ran out of gas which occurred often because he never filled the tank. What the heck?? Unbelievable.

tonigonzalez
Автор

I like the show, but I find that Judge Levy (Judge Judy's son) is a bully and insults the participants.

mariaderk
Автор

Show us more if you want us to watch. Im hanging out to watch it as I see BALIFF BYRD is in it. PLS PLS PLAY MORE

wendyjbowman
Автор

The show is slow and the judges do too much talking. Adam Levy has crazy eyes and a dull personality and doesn't blend well with the other two judges. Not liking this new show 👎🏽

spiritqueen
Автор

In the episode with the film editor -- was there a mistake in the judgement? The judges agreed that the editor (defendant) did a little bit of work which may have helped the 2nd editor complete the job, but did not do all of the work, nor did he communicate properly via email. In the discussion of how much he should get paid for the little bit of work he did, the decision was to pay him 20% of the $3000 or $600. So the defendant should keep $600 of the money he was paid and the plaintiff should have gotten $2400 refunded to her. But when the verdict was announced, they gave $600 to the plaintiff, and the defendant got to keep $2400 of the $3000, for not doing the work! I think the judges were hasty and mixed up, and screwed up their own verdict, and that's the last episode I'll ever watch. I hope they fix that verdict -- justice was NOT done, not even consistent with what the judges themselves said. They screwed up.

nancym
Автор

Remember this is fake, real people but fake playing like this is real, don't take this serious please.

centsoutofnonsense
Автор

7/15/23: I've been watching this show for the past 3 days and I have come to the conclusion that I do not care for Judge Tanya Acker. She's a bully straight up, and in some respects, she reminds me of Judge Judy, another judge I do not care for at all. Acker LOVES TO BE HEARD and talks all over whomever she's talking to, and if there’s any resistance or rolling of the eyes, OMG, look out, ‘cause she’s ready to battle! She'll ask questions and then not allow that person to answer, but if they attempt to answer, she goes all in with chastising them as if they are children to be quiet because SHE is speaking. WTF? Why ask questions in the first place? She got on my nerves in the few episodes I’ve seen! When she says she’s done speaking, so am I in hearing her voice. She's annoying. I couldn't, God forbid, be in a court of law in front of her on some case of my own, because the bailiff would have to haul me out because of my insubordinate attitude towards her and fine me in contempt of Court 'cause I would let her have it with words that she wouldn't know how to handle and would be aghast to hear them. I love Judge Patricia DiMango. She, at least, gives a person a fair chance to speak their piece, answer HER questions, good, bad or indifferent, while Judge Adam Levy is the voice of reason in many respects. If Acker’s trying to get her own show with her bullying tactics and over-the-top offensive attitude, think again, honey, ‘cause this is one chick who WILL NOT be watching. Do me a favor and get rid of her...UGH!

conishkee