General Chemistry 1A. Lecture 06. Quantum Numbers.

preview_player
Показать описание
UCI Chem 1A General Chemistry (Winter 2013)
Lec 06. General Chemistry -- Quantum Numbers
Instructor: Amanda Brindley, Ph.D.

License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA

This video is part of a 23-lecture undergraduate-level course titled "General Chemistry" taught at UC Irvine by Amanda Brindley, Ph.D.

Recorded on March 9, 2013.

Index of Topics:
0:00:16 Quantum Numbers - Introduction
0:03:56 Principle Quantum Number
0:04:30 Angular Momentum Quantum Number
0:07:01 Magnetic Quantum Number
0:09:09 Filling in Quantum Numbers
0:15:05 Shielding and Penetration
0:18:00 Energies of Orbitals
0:21:12 Electron Configuration
0:26:11 Energies in Relation to Periodic Table
0:28:07 Diamagnetism vs Paramagnetism
0:30:15 Electron Configurations of Ions
0:33:14 Electron Configuration Exception
0:36:05 Examples of Configuration
0:40:30 Discussion Question
0:42:25 Periodic Trends
0:43:37 Development of the Periodic Table
0:45:24 Periodic Table Outline
0:46:17 Effective Nuclear Charge
0:48:47 Atomic Radius
0:54:39 Ionic Radius

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

At 5:57, n equals 4 l equals 3, 2, 1, 0 and n equals 5 l equals 4, 3, 2, 1, 0 Don't forget that for "l", 0 IS included

laurarincon
Автор

i am in love with the professor omg she is much better than mine prof

BL-omhn
Автор

@57.10 That stare!! Amazing lectures by the way.

joehunt
Автор

I love ALL of your lectures!!! I do not go to UC Irvine...I'm just curious about electron configuration because I already know who the atomic nucleus works and I know how the physics of celestial objects work but this is a bit more challenging. Anyway...thank you! :)

ChavisvonBradfordscience
Автор

57:10 baw dr brindley wasn't playin with their asses lmaooo

noahmcd
Автор

What is the difference between orbital and subshell? thanks

greenrabbit-
Автор

I'm confused Chromium and Molybdenum don't form 1+ ions they form 2+, but that's not what she said.

pretzels
Автор

why isn't it Cu>Cu+>Cu2+>O->O2- at the end? i thought as you move to a larger shell value, the radius increases

TiNg-nkzt
Автор

why i can't view her profile at the website?
she not teaching at uc irvine now?

consitatinschneider
Автор

lies about the electron spin. you can certainly have two electrons in the same orbital with the same spin. it's called a super conductor.

PANDORASBOXRELEASE
Автор

She's missing the point entirely...it's a poor analogy. In terms on quantum chemistry, we do NOT want to be concerned with position, since Heisenberg's uncertainty principle postulates that to know position, we can cannot know the energy value, and vice versa. Her analogy makes it seem like we're concerned with position, when it is more probabilistic, than anything else. She should have just focused on introducing n, l, ml, and ms, and gone from there.

Noveleffect