filmov
tv
Will studying church history destroy your testimony?
![preview_player](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bdVExYtp6NA/maxresdefault.jpg)
Показать описание
In this episode, Dave talks about a framework originally outlined by Bruce and Marie Hafen that can help members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints formulate realistic expectations, and can help them approach tough questions in a productive way.
FOOTNOTES (sorry links aren't clickable yet. That feature is coming soon. In the meantime, copy/paste!)
Notes:
— “We need to look longer and harder at difficult questions and pat answers, but without lurching from extreme innocence to extreme skepticism. Today’s world is full of hard-core skeptics who love to ‘enlighten’ those who are stuck in idealistic simplicity, offering them the doubt and agnosticism of complexity as a seemingly brave new way of life” Bruce and Marie Hafen, “Faith Is Not Blind,” pg. 13.
— There are cons associated with staying permanently in Stage 1 or Stage 2. The Hafens teach in their book, “When we don’t see the gap [between the ideal and the real] or we focus only on the ideal while blocking out the real, our perspective lacks depth. If this is our paradigm, faith can be both blind and shallow, because it lacks awareness and careful thought. These limitations can keep us from extending our roots into the soil of real experience deeply enough to form the solid foundation needed to withstand the strong winds of adversity. Growing deep roots requires that we learn to work through uncomfortable realities” (pg. 12).
On the other side you’ve got the dangers of Stage Two: “...despite the value of becoming aware of complexity, one’s acceptance of the clouds of uncertainty can become so complete that the iron rod fades into the surrounding mists, and skepticism becomes not just a helpful tool but a guiding philosophy” (pg. 12-13).
FOOTNOTES (sorry links aren't clickable yet. That feature is coming soon. In the meantime, copy/paste!)
Notes:
— “We need to look longer and harder at difficult questions and pat answers, but without lurching from extreme innocence to extreme skepticism. Today’s world is full of hard-core skeptics who love to ‘enlighten’ those who are stuck in idealistic simplicity, offering them the doubt and agnosticism of complexity as a seemingly brave new way of life” Bruce and Marie Hafen, “Faith Is Not Blind,” pg. 13.
— There are cons associated with staying permanently in Stage 1 or Stage 2. The Hafens teach in their book, “When we don’t see the gap [between the ideal and the real] or we focus only on the ideal while blocking out the real, our perspective lacks depth. If this is our paradigm, faith can be both blind and shallow, because it lacks awareness and careful thought. These limitations can keep us from extending our roots into the soil of real experience deeply enough to form the solid foundation needed to withstand the strong winds of adversity. Growing deep roots requires that we learn to work through uncomfortable realities” (pg. 12).
On the other side you’ve got the dangers of Stage Two: “...despite the value of becoming aware of complexity, one’s acceptance of the clouds of uncertainty can become so complete that the iron rod fades into the surrounding mists, and skepticism becomes not just a helpful tool but a guiding philosophy” (pg. 12-13).
Комментарии