Basic Antigravity Engine

This is a basic fuel-less antigravity engine. Most things need air or some type of fuel such as rocket fuel to propel forward. This does not require fuel but only electricity to power everything and some timing circuitry.

It has the capability to travel great distances through space with the proper machining and circuitry. It only requires a star or sun to charge back up. Why isn't Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos not doing this?
It clearly violates N3L. This is a reactionless space drive engine.

Thanks for watching. Please LIKE, SHARE, COMMENT and SUBSCRIBE
╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝

[dieboodskapper]

U MUST USE 3 GYROS SPACED 120 DEG FOR HORISONTAL STABILIZATION

[arinaZamorochka]

It's antigravity engine. Amazing👍

[waynesworldcoinsaustralia]

Using two Giro Wheels is impressive I may not have spelt that correctly some people will still criticize it it is not an antimatter reactor it is still awesome it's not claiming to be creating its own gravitational field

[Spaceranger-]

I can't understand by just looking the video, can you explain it, like how it works and other things related to it please...😊

[FVLMEN]

I call it a _gyro-inertial repulsine_ drive. You don't even need a 3 axle rig like Sandy Kidd's. Counter rotation along a single axis will do because the principle is inertial torsion to the point of gravitational inversion. Gravity is a form of inertia towards the earth. When you enact counter rotation you induce an inertial inversion situation where a mass only finds inertial alleviation away from the presence of gravity like a type of buoyancy. If one could get the flywheel of a gyro to spin, say clockwise, whilst simultaneously spinning the entire gyro body counterclockwise, the entire device will levitate. It does not matter if you invert the directions of spin or flip the whole device upside-down -- It will always levitate away from the earth.
A non-kinetic version of this kind I call a _magneto-dielectric repulsine drive_ can be realized whereby the atomic mass of individual atoms is distorted and arrayed allowing inertial propulsion. Propulsion via matter's own mass. Because it works in the atomic level efficiency skyrockets compared to that of a spinning system and speeds close to the speed of light are palpable. I won't say the engineering details of this system.

[m.j.r.technologyreveiws]

It was the grinder tool that supplied the initial rotational acceleration to the gyro. Your finger then supplied a different rotation causing a vector deflection of the stored energy to lift the weight. The point is that energy had to be initially supplied. Alway look at where the energy came from. Through a rock and it will rise against gravity. The gyro will run out of rotational energy and fall. No different than the rock.

[myfalconry]

It need to work in the opposite way with the base spinning then when you spin the wheels it causes lift on the base. A good starting would be. A figit spinner with gyros spinning in counter opertive directions. Based on gyro mass direction and speed

[antigrav]

I think for laughs you should next try adjusting the stops to where the gyros rest at the horizontal instead of having them start at a downward angle. If so, then during when you apply torque with your hand in the horizontal plane upon the hub, I'd be dang curious to see if the hub would now reduce spring compression even more, or lift off from the spring momentarily along the shaft during your hand torque

[nostress]

The whole mechanizm did not rise up. It is not antigravity

[BurakGaming]

Could you please explain how it goes higher?, as far as I understand the sum of force to object is 0 because of its fast turns?

[Imaginationvision]

How your engine technology will lift/levitate the anti-gravity vehicle?

[abdelghanisiradj]

I've been searching in this field for two years and haven't found an explanation yet

[O-Kyklop]

Archimedes did ask for a fixed point and he would have been able to move the Planet.
I began a couple of days ago to think again about gyros, after seeing a video on YT from the university of Bremen, Germany.
The teacher let two cylinders roll down a ramp. Same length, same diameter but the one hollow and the other massiv. The hollow one rolled down slower, evidently resisting "g" more than the massiv one.
The Gyro effect.
A gyro can lay horizontal, hanging only at one end of its axis. Evidently resisting the down pull of g. If it is a pull...
But, all these effects are only possible as long as the gyro/cylinder have a contact with the ground, at one point.
It is like you and me standing up from a chair. We set feet on the ground and overcome g, and get upright. Otherwise it is not possible. Without this fixed point a spinning gyro would fall down like anything else. It needs a connection to the ground to act against g. They are two different "systems", Earth-g and the spinning gyro.
Now, as a layman that I am, my question is: Could be possible to insert some kind of "function" into the Gyro-system to work as a fixed point, replacing in this way the function of the Earth-Ground?
To depict somehow the idea....a kind of "flow" through the center of the spinning wheel, air, subatomic particles, Aether or whatever, that could act as that fixed point and even drive the spin of the wheel.
Otherwise, another possibility would be to transfer so much mass to the rim of the wheel as to generate spontaneously that fixed point in the Gyro-system.
Do gyros fall simultaneously when one is spinning?
So. I hope you find something useful in these lines. But it is good enough for me if you don't yawn by reading them.

[crystallake]

there are no mechanical components in the crafts we are working on.

[Imaginationvision]

How you call it an engine?
It looks like just an GYROSCOPIC EFFECT.

[ThankYouESM]

From what I've understood... 3 Searle motors.. whereas each is a motor wheel with many other motor wheels inside all spinning in a clockwise* direction reaching near maximum structural integrity... needs to replace those 2 gyros.

[jeffborders]

The need for fuel is the calories you're burning in spinning it up and keeping it spun up. All that energy input despite blatantly lying about no energy input, to get the equivalent of an electrostatic like repulsion or gravity if you insist, of having some of its weight reduced enough to sit higher on a spring load from which it never stops being pressed to. So imagine the fuel needed, or "additional hand spinning" required to get it to sit even higher on the spring load. Now realize the Paul exclusion principle applies and those two flywheels are not going to occupy the same space at the same time at the very top where they're processing toward. Eventually they crash into each other with heat and light and sparks as they can't bridge the gap required to actually levitate off the spring load completely and disappear into the sky as fast as light.

[prabhjeetsingh]

so basically it wont be wrong to say that the gyros can keep an object stable where it remains in 3d irrespective of gravity. thus minimal fuel places with big gyros are easily possible. do inform me if i m missing something

[kalan]

No more need for fuel???? energy is needed to start the rotation! Some kind of fuel is still needed

[OrdinaryGothic]

I wish this was anti gravity. Put a scale underneath and you will see the weight is the same before, during and after.