Was the USSR communist?

preview_player
Показать описание
The Russian Revolution was the greatest event in history, with the working class and poor taking power into their own hands for the first time. In this talk, Keelan Kellegher will speak about the Stalinist degeneration of the USSR that led to its demise.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

If this is original work, this kid is amazing.

dld
Автор

These young socialists are wonderful speakers. I have faith in Socialism.

christopherleary
Автор

We have to able to understand our failures as marxists and work to implement a true workers' state!!

jesseweideman
Автор

What a successful lecture, comrade. Greetings from the German Section!

derantiobskurant
Автор

I don't think it was communist as there was no new plan to eliminate the class relation and also the bureaucracy was degenerative force

tanujSE
Автор

Interesting. Thanks for this discussion.

charleskesner
Автор

WELL What to say about this lecture. Its just Clear Truthfull and Brilliant.

heldergoncalves
Автор

Bro I need to see all the sources you’re getting from the Soviet union and on the side note the housing problem has only been getting worse since the 1990s in the 50s you could buy 10 houses for a penny (I’m joking about the penny but you get my point) I’m not justifying capitalism It’s just back then in the 50s there’s a lot less people in the US and worldwide to feed and to house then today but I don’t know I would like to hear your comment on this

Serranojaeger
Автор

How does one square nationalization of industry with the inability of socialism to exist in one state?

This point confuses me.

cloudmane
Автор

Samir Amin paraphrases “bureaucracy” as bourgois ideology

minhng
Автор

Stalinists did not believe that the USSR was on its way to communism. Stalin himself kept banging on about the final victory of socialism being when the world revolution is realised. Khrushchevite revisionism is not something that stalinists stand by

diabetusultrainstinct
Автор

Funny...its almost like my idea of history is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than his...

zachmorgan
Автор

Stalin would have loved him, but still purged him with everyone else.

justinmathews
Автор

"it could not without the spreading of the revolution" but it did spread, there were several more workers' states and some of them are still standing

reversedragon
Автор

Learn to read and understand Marx Engels Lenin and history too for that matter as your analysis of the Soviet Union dosn't match with any of them. It's always supriced me how the trotskiete retelling of Soviet hostory is so similar to that of the capitalists only difference is that trots make out Trotsky to be a messiah figure even though he was much of an opertunistic buerocrat lusting for power and influence as any one else in the post revolution USSR. At the end of the day it just feels like braindead arguments about transports where nothing matters unless X side wins. And that's not to mention the over exaggerations on historucal figures such as Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky. It was workers that shaped history, not great men, and to say otherwise is an idealogical trap resulted from our current capitalist system.

Please don't bastardize the legacy of the working class for your own political agenda. Your dogmas are not coherent with history and only serves to dilute marxism to the point where liberals can call themselves communists. Communism is not a sect that you join, it's about the things you learn and do.

borelespork
Автор

The USSR was socialist, not communist.

dallaskenn
Автор

Your criticism of Stalin is seemingly narrow and does not link to historical balckground. Just look at achievements under Stalin, even pro capitalist Russians acknowledge that

minhng