Top 5 Dying Programming Languages In 2021 | Worst Programming Languages In 2021 | Simplilearn

This Top 5 Dying Programming Languages in 2021will give you a quick overview of the fading programming languages in 2021 so that you can choose the right language for your future career.

#DyingProgrammingLanguages ##DyingProgrammingLanguages2021 #Top5DyingProgrammingLanguages #WorstProgrammingLanguages #DeadProgrammingLanguages #Simplilearn

Watch more trending videos:

➡️ About Post Graduate Program In Full Stack Web Development
This program will give you the foundation for building full-stack web apps using the Java programming language. You'll begin with the basics of JavaScript, and then venture into some of the more advanced concepts like Angular, Spring Boot, Hibernate, JSPs, and MVC. Now is the perfect time to get started on your career as a full-stack web developer!

✅ Key Features
- Caltech CTME Post Graduate Certificate
- Enrolment in Simplilearn’s JobAssist
- Receive up to 25 CEUs from Caltech CTME
- Simplilearn's JobAssist helps you get noticed by top hiring companies
- Attend Masterclasses from Caltech CTME instructors
- Live virtual classes led by industry experts, hands-on projects and integrated labs
- Online Convocation by Caltech CTME Program Director
- 20 lesson-end and 5 phase-end projects
- Capstone Project in 4 domains
- Caltech CTME Circle Membership
- Build your own portfolio on GitHub

✅ Skills Covered
- Agile
- JAVA
- Hibernate and JPA
- Spring Core 50
- DevOps
- HTML5 and CSS3
- AWS
- JavaScript ES6
- Servlets
- SOAP and REST
- JSP

🔥🔥 Interested in Attending Live Classes? Call Us: IN - 18002127688 / US - [phone]

[ck]

1. Assembly
2. Pascal
3. Haskell
4. Erlang
5. Coffee Script

[HossamKandil]

0:50 Assembly
1:50 Pascal
3:10 Haskell
4:27 ERLANG
5:27 Coffee script

[devotiongeo]

Haskell and Erlang?! Are you kidding me?
Because you can't program in functional languages, doesn't mean they're dying.

[kevinsebzda]

No hot takes here, tbh.

Is Ruby on Rails not on the list because it's already dead or because Pascal, Haskell and Erlang are a low bar to cruise over?

[vishaliniravi]

Wat are the basic requirements for non-tech graduate or post graduate to learn data science? Can u pls give details?

[Soulseeologia]

These are the five I will learn so they don’t die out

[JamesParkWatt]

I disagree with assembly but agree with the rest. It's likely in time nobody will be expected to code in it directly we have compilers for that but certain professions are required to be able to understand it such as security researchers.

[PaulTaylor]

C is not a "purely functional programming language"...

[sekharapramod]

Assembly's platform dependency is not so much an issue anymore as almost all computers run either x86_64 or ARM. And it's not anymore dead than it was when C was first introduced, given every line of C and C++ code and that off many other languages still has to get compiled to Assembly first and then be assembled into an executable.

[robertlatta]

Lol we're learning Haskell at Uni (and my course is ranked 5th in the country) so it can't be all that bad?

[macadameane]

Assembly will never truly be dead because all languages must compile into machine instructions eventually, but it is very niche. My friend just took a required college course that required ARM assembly coding.

[spsmspsm]

Assembly is far from dead. Everything in a way is translated to it or bytecode. As long as compilation is needed, assemblers will be involved

[zombiesbyte]

I think it might be incorrect to say Assembly is dead. I think it's probably got a small/niche use case but I think it's still used and replied upon. It's the lowest level programming language that I know and is really popular in particular circles... It's just not mainstream. You have to remember how old most of these langues are so that fact that they even appear on a list in 2021 just shows how much they have dominated through the absolute saturation of new 'cooler' sounding languages. I really think 'dead' is a word that is too final and makes a bold statement, I'd have opted for 'unpopular' perhaps.

[rishisingh]

Assembly languages are still used widely to create drivers, processor register access etc.

[fmaz]

I have to disagree with ASM. It is still used for time-critical applications and embedded systems.

No one is coding a full software with ASM, but if you need an optimized driver, firmware or something really fast for a very specific component, ASM is still the best choice.

Comparing a low level language to a high level language such as Java makes me doubt that you understand the purpose of ASM.

Some usages from wikipedia:
Code that must interact directly with the hardware, for example in device drivers and interrupt handlers.

In an embedded processor or DSP, high-repetition interrupts require the shortest number of cycles per interrupt, such as an interrupt that occurs 1000 or 10000 times a second.

Programs that need to use processor-specific instructions not implemented in a compiler. A common example is the bitwise rotation instruction at the core of many encryption algorithms, as well as querying the parity of a byte or the 4-bit carry of an addition.

A stand-alone executable of compact size is required that must execute without recourse to the run-time components or libraries associated with a high-level language. Examples have included firmware for telephones, automobile fuel and ignition systems, air-conditioning control systems, security systems, and sensors.

Programs with performance-sensitive inner loops, where assembly language provides optimization opportunities that are difficult to achieve in a high-level language. For example,  linear cosine version from x264[48]).

Programs that create vectorized functions for programs in higher-level languages such as C. In the higher-level language this is sometimes aided by compiler intrinsic functions which map directly to SIMD mnemonics, but nevertheless result in a one-to-one assembly conversion specific for the given vector processor.

Real-time programs such as simulations, flight navigation systems, and medical equipment. For example, in a fly-by-wire system, telemetry must be interpreted and acted upon within strict time constraints. Such systems must eliminate sources of unpredictable delays, which may be created by (some) interpreted languages, automatic garbage collection, paging operations, or preemptive multitasking. However, some higher-level languages incorporate run-time components and operating system interfaces that can introduce such delays. Choosing assembly or lower level languages for such systems gives programmers greater visibility and control over processing details.

Cryptographic algorithms that must always take strictly the same time to execute, preventing timing attacks.

Modify and extend legacy code written for IBM mainframe computers.[49] [50]

Situations where complete control over the environment is required, in extremely high-security situations where nothing can be taken for granted.

Computer viruses,  bootloaders, certain device drivers, or other items very close to the hardware or low-level operating system.

Instruction set simulators for monitoring, tracing and debugging where additional overhead is kept to a minimum.

Situations where no high-level language exists, on a new or specialized processor for which no cross compiler is available.

Reverse-engineering and modifying program files such as:

existing binaries that may or may not have originally been written in a high-level language, for example when trying to recreate programs for which source code is not available or has been lost, or cracking copy protection of proprietary software.

Video games (also termed ROM hacking), which is possible via several methods. The most widely employed method is altering program code at the assembly language

[jewulo]

How can any Assembly Programming Language be a dying language when it is crucial to getting any Operating System of the ground on a new Hardware platform?

[riley]

Assembly won't ever die, it's not really a language in the same way that other languages are and there is always going to be some need for it. I also don't think Haskell is dying, just unpopular. C is NOT a functional programming language, it is imperative. Functional languages will always be less popular than imperative languages because they are different and dare I say harder to use properly.

[asuchy]

They have said assembly is dying for over twenty years now. So, I have my doubts.

[spsmspsm]

And haskell is not difficult to learn. I would place fortran or cobol instead

[liuch]

Worst in what sense? There is a difference between unpopular and dying. I bet most of these languages will live longer than the video producer.