Did scribal interpolation lead to mistakes in the 'New Testament'? | Jewish Apologetics

preview_player
Показать описание
Modern textual critics have identified sections of the Christian New Testament as additional material that were written centuries after the gospels were originally written. Most of this textual variation took place within the first three centuries of the early Christian era.

Sources:
--------------------

Bart Ehrman Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why. New York: HarperOne, 2007.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The manuscripts referred to in this video are to the Alexandrian Greek Texts--which do differ significantly--not the Texts used in the Received Text, which enjoy extraordinary agreement among over 5000 extant texts

jocelyneandersen
Автор

and they say the bible isn't corrupted LOL

abdulrabawadh
Автор

I just found your videos, and I find them very informative, not that I agree all the way, but you have open a few doors. If we would remove all the side notes and kept the wrights that were of one person, using a a person that understands hand wighting, what would be left? I do not take the KJV word for word, but what is being said to me alone. I know many things were added to old text. A lot of this was added years after. I think I will leave it at that.

NotABushFan