filmov
tv
Was Women's Silence ADDED to the Bible? [1 Corinthians 14:34-35]
Показать описание
1 Corinthians 14 34-35 contains two controversial verses about women being silent in church. It's a passage often brought up in Christian circles when discussing women's church ministry, especially women preaching. However, these verses were probably added to the text later. In this video I explore why most scholars think these verses are an interpolation.
Should women remain silent in church? 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 Explained. Are Women Permitted to Speak in Church? What Does 1 Corinthians 14 Mean When It Says That Women Are to Keep Silent in the Church?
Join this channel to get access to perks:
+ Help me make more videos!
BTC Wallet: 1MJYqAi5VMfPH3qcJeeCCmhcnJyKwWgPwN
+ Stay in the loop:
This channel is now known as Tablets and Temples, unpacking ancient history and religion. Formerly known as Bible Unboxed.
-----------
In the video, I claimed that most scholars view these verses as a later addition. This claim comes from two sources:
Additionally, The New Oxford Annotated Bible has this to say about 33b-36:
"Many scholars regard this passage as a later non-Pauline addition, because it disrupts the flow of the argument from v. 33a to v. 37; it contradicts the assumption of 11.5 that women will prat and prophesy in the assembly; it resembles the viewpoint of the Deutero-Pauline letters (see 1 Tim 2.9-15); it exhibits non-Pauline sentiments, e.g. v. 34b, as the law also says, and vv. 34-35 appear after 14.40 in some manuscripts."
Payne cites evidence discussed in The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research, ed. K. Wachtel and M. Holmes (Atlanta: SBL, 2011), page 58
Payne and the sources he cites have thus far relied on analysis of the ink of the markings, they have also stated that they are awaiting further more advanced ink analysis which should provide more clarity on the question of dating the markings.
------------
More general sources:
Discussion of Codex Vaticanus: Philip B. Payne, “Fuldensis, Sigla for Variants in Vaticanus, and 1 Cor 14.34-5,” NTS 41 (1995) 240-50, 261.
You'll find the traditional view argued in the commentaries of Brock/Wannenwetsch (2016), Ciampa/Rosner (2010), Garland (2003), Nash (2009), Perkins (2012), and Thiselton (2000) - However, my main criticism of these commentaries is that even several of the newer ones rely on quite dated arguments, and don't critically engage with the alternative views.
Topics:
1 corinthians 14 explained, 1 corinthians 14:34-35, 1 corinthians 14 34-35, 1 corinthians 14 34, 1 corinthians 14, women keep silent, women silent in church, 1 corinthians 14 34-35 explained, can women preach in church, can women preach, should women be silent in church, can women speak in church, John macarthur, codex vaticanus, Women should remain silent in the churches, bart ehrman 1 corinthians 14, dan mcclellan 1 corinthians 14, bart ehrman exposes new testament errors
Should women remain silent in church? 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 Explained. Are Women Permitted to Speak in Church? What Does 1 Corinthians 14 Mean When It Says That Women Are to Keep Silent in the Church?
Join this channel to get access to perks:
+ Help me make more videos!
BTC Wallet: 1MJYqAi5VMfPH3qcJeeCCmhcnJyKwWgPwN
+ Stay in the loop:
This channel is now known as Tablets and Temples, unpacking ancient history and religion. Formerly known as Bible Unboxed.
-----------
In the video, I claimed that most scholars view these verses as a later addition. This claim comes from two sources:
Additionally, The New Oxford Annotated Bible has this to say about 33b-36:
"Many scholars regard this passage as a later non-Pauline addition, because it disrupts the flow of the argument from v. 33a to v. 37; it contradicts the assumption of 11.5 that women will prat and prophesy in the assembly; it resembles the viewpoint of the Deutero-Pauline letters (see 1 Tim 2.9-15); it exhibits non-Pauline sentiments, e.g. v. 34b, as the law also says, and vv. 34-35 appear after 14.40 in some manuscripts."
Payne cites evidence discussed in The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research, ed. K. Wachtel and M. Holmes (Atlanta: SBL, 2011), page 58
Payne and the sources he cites have thus far relied on analysis of the ink of the markings, they have also stated that they are awaiting further more advanced ink analysis which should provide more clarity on the question of dating the markings.
------------
More general sources:
Discussion of Codex Vaticanus: Philip B. Payne, “Fuldensis, Sigla for Variants in Vaticanus, and 1 Cor 14.34-5,” NTS 41 (1995) 240-50, 261.
You'll find the traditional view argued in the commentaries of Brock/Wannenwetsch (2016), Ciampa/Rosner (2010), Garland (2003), Nash (2009), Perkins (2012), and Thiselton (2000) - However, my main criticism of these commentaries is that even several of the newer ones rely on quite dated arguments, and don't critically engage with the alternative views.
Topics:
1 corinthians 14 explained, 1 corinthians 14:34-35, 1 corinthians 14 34-35, 1 corinthians 14 34, 1 corinthians 14, women keep silent, women silent in church, 1 corinthians 14 34-35 explained, can women preach in church, can women preach, should women be silent in church, can women speak in church, John macarthur, codex vaticanus, Women should remain silent in the churches, bart ehrman 1 corinthians 14, dan mcclellan 1 corinthians 14, bart ehrman exposes new testament errors
Комментарии