These Countries Will Be Destroyed in World War 3

Could World War III be looming?

The reluctance of the US and NATO to arm Ukraine suggests a bigger fear: preventing conflict escalation beyond its borders. This war could spiral, unleashing a modern World War III.

Yet, Ukraine isn't the sole concern. Russia's boldness, China's global ambitions, and North Korea's actions have swiftly shifted power dynamics in the last 15 years. The post-Cold War slumber is over, giving way to intensified great power rivalry and tense intersections.

Imagine this: a hypothetical WWIII, with two sides at odds. One, a democratic coalition led by the US; the other, an authoritarian bloc, led by China and spanning the Eurasian landmass.

If a general conflict were to break out between the two alliances, which are the countries likeliest to become fronts in the war, and therefore likeliest to be wrecked in the process?

Let's find out.

#themilitaryshow

[friendoftellus]

The world situation today is very similar to what it was like shortly before the second world war !!! And that is extremely worrying !!!

[aungtin]

3 countries. yes. but every country will be affected in most horrific manner.

[chantalpeerbocus]

We pray for peace. No war, no death. .

[Lorenzo-ewso]

I've been reading some comments, ' Don't forget the radiation fallout, The blocking out of the sun, Nuclear Winter, Chemical Warfare, Fall out from Nuclear Plants, Water and food contamination. If you survived all these things you and your children and their children, would be living underground for decades I don't think that would work either. 💀☠👿💀☠👿💀☠👿💀☠

[theobserver]

And at this moment, WW3 is kicking off in the Middle East...

[golden.lights.twinkle]

Any nuclear war would effectively destroy the entire planet. Damage could not be contained to any nation or any continent. The world's economy would crash and there would be mass death, injury, disease, famine and starvation. Those in Africa would be best equipped to survive since they are used to dealing with such difficulties.

[alordswatchman]

Russia couldn't even take Kiev, you give what's left of their military to much credit.

[jamesstratton]

There will be more devastation than we realize.

[judithoconnor]

I hope and pray there is not a WWIII. I hope saner minds prevail.

[jamesnoonanyoutube]

Soldiers in this serious of a conflict do not know how to hold back and strike strategic targets only. You can’t make things that complicated for them, in a war with this high of stakes.

[xRoRox]

A lovely video to watch before bedtime 🥱

[soniaellis]

Russia wanted to join Nato in the early 2000s but America and the western allies refused, they said their would be organizational problems, what they really meant was, no opposition, no need for Nato and all those econonies proped up on military spending, ( the goverments love their wepons).

[max]

Quote attributed to Albert Einstein: "I don't know which weapons will be used in WW3, but I know what weapons will be used in WW4: Sticks and stones"

[preppertrucker]

A conventional WW3 at first but I’m pretty sure it will go nuclear pretty quickly as soon as one nuclear power starts to lose….

[DantesPancea]

Incredible how you didn't even mention attacks on USA mainland

[tasawwursadiq]

Umm I'm sure the US dont care about killing civilians. Iraq and Afghanistan is an example.

[Txtmdr]

The creator missed the Middle East. that will be the first flash point to ignite the WWW3.

[DABmonger]

I'm no expert, but I think you're neglecting the extent of the defence capabilities Europe as a whole has, including the NATO plans to suppress any possible offensive actions from Królewiec (Kaliningrad).

[GeorgeNzioki-lsnn]

Us jeopardizing Europe peace and security over influence is rather appalling Us must keep out of Europe

[avengerpz]

for once.... there will be NO conventional ww3.