Change in 162 CrPC corresponding section 181 BNSS | Cross examination & contradiction #law #newlaw

Chand in BNSS related to statement of witness to police | Change in new law related to statement in BNSS | Change in Section 162 CrPC corresponding 181 BNSS | What not to say in a police statement | Types of police statements | Example of a police statement |Giving a statement to police what happens next | Statement given to police is not admissible in court | Making a statement to police about domestic violence | Statement taking police | If you give a statement to the police do you have to go to courtHow to use any statement of witness in evidence | gawah ke byan se sakshi ko kaise virodhabhas dikhaye | kya police ko diya gaya byan court me many hai? contradiction of witness in new law | Contradiction of witness with his previous statement | Purpose of statement under section 161 CrPC | Dying declaration of witness | site plan 162 CrPC 181 BNSS | Disclosure statement of accused hit by 162 CrPC and 181 BNSS | what are bar on the statement to police in BNSS or CrPC? statement of witness shall not be signed by the witness making it. section 26 BNSS is dying declaration | section 23 of BNSS is section 27 Indian Evidence Act | statement of witness can only be used for contradiction of the witness making it | re-examination of the witness may also be done contradicting the witness | is there any exception of 162 CrPC and 181 BNSS | 162 CrPC is now in New criminal law | 162 CrPC is not in BNSS? Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 | BNSS CrPC | the Code of criminal procedure | statement of witness in BNSS | Witness would have been called for prosecution | Bharatiya Sakshhya Adhiniyam 2023 | Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 | applicability of new criminal laws | statement should have been duly proved than only contradict | Cross Examination Chief Examination and reexamination of witness in court | How to contradict a witness with his previous statement | gawah ke byan ki kya value hai | Gawah ki prti pariksha kaise karen |
162. Statements to police not to be signed : Use of statements in evidence.
(1)
No statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of an investigation under this Chapter, shall, if reduced to writing, be signed by the person making it; nor shall any such statement or any record thereof, whether in a police diary or otherwise, or any part of such statement of record, be used for any purpose, save as hereinafter provided, at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when such statement was made :
Provided that when any witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial whose statement has been reduced into writing as aforesaid, any part of his statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict such witness in the manner provided by section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872); and when any part of such statement is so used, any part thereof may also be used in the re-examination of such witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in his cross-examination.
(2)
Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to any statement falling within the provisions of clause (1) of section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), or to affect the provisions of section 27 of that Act.
Explanation. - An omission to state a fact or circumstances in the statement referred to in sub-section (1) may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs and whether any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.
#bnss #crpc #bharatiyanagariksurakshasanhita2023 #bharatiyanagariksuraksha #contradictionofwitness #contradiction #wtiness #section145indianevidenceact #section148bsa |

[International-villager.]

Deep analysis on 161 and 162 and effect when signed by maker

[International-villager.]

Seizure memo m sign hote h accused as well as making Person k be yahn not signing by maker