Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate, Supreme Court. Topic: New Criminal Laws - Part 2

preview_player
Показать описание
Friday Group:
Topic: New Criminal Laws - Part 2
Speaker: Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate. Supreme Court of India.
Organizer : G.Seshagiri Rao, Advocate Supreme Court of India.

  1. Friday Group Seshagiri Rao
  2. G.Seshagiri Rao
  3. Friday Group
  4. S. Nagamuthu Mr. Justice
  5. S. Nagamuthu
  6. Nagamuthu
Рекомендации по теме
Nagamuthu .S, Mr. 1:19:09

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate, Supreme Court. Topic: New Criminal Laws - Part 1

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. 1:03:43

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate. Documentary Evidence in Criminal Cases.

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. 1:07:26

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate. Creativity in Cross Examination

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. 1:12:44

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate, Supreme Court. Topic: New Criminal Laws - Part 4

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. 0:39:16

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate. Topic: Arrest and Bail in PMLA cases - Part 1

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. 1:07:30

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate, Supreme Court. Topic: New Criminal Laws - Part 3

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. 1:09:28

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate, Supreme Court. Topic: New Criminal Laws - Part 2

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. 1:06:15

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate. Constructive Liability in Criminal Law.

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. 0:55:50

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate, Supreme Court. Topic: New Criminal Laws - Part 5

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. 1:17:06

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Advocate. Topic: Arrest and Bail in PMLA cases - Part 2

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. 1:13:06

Nagamuthu .S, Mr. Justice (retd), Sr. Adv. Topic: Prosecution under PMLA & scheduled offences -P...

Mr. Justice (Retd.) 1:13:06

Mr. Justice (Retd.) S. Nagamuthu, Topic: Principles of Judicial Evidence - Part 1

Appreciation of Evidence 1:57:42

Appreciation of Evidence in Criminal Law : Justice S. Nagamuthu, Judge of Madras High Court

Mr. Justice (Retd.) 1:04:26

Mr. Justice (Retd.) S. Nagamuthu Sr. Adv. Topic: 2018-2019 Developments in Criminal Jurisprudence

Mr. Justice (Retd.) 1:22:10

Mr. Justice (Retd.) S. Nagamuthu Sr. Adv. Topic: Fair Investigation - A Human Right

Mr. Justice (Retd.) 1:30:42

Mr. Justice (Retd.) S. Nagamuthu, Topic: Principles of Judicial Evidence - Part 2

Must Watch Senior 0:03:32

Must Watch Senior Advocate S. Nagamuthu on Bribe taker and Bribe Giver

Law of FIR 2:52:22

Law of FIR and Investigation | Justice Nagamuthu | Nyaya Forum

Witness Should Not 0:44:27

Witness Should Not Be Called Hostile Under Section 154 Evidence Act! Justice Nagamuthu In SC #law

P. Chidambaram argued 0:02:30

P. Chidambaram argued before The Supreme Court of India

Strange Criminal Cases 2:22:01

Strange Criminal Cases Encountered by Justice S Nagamuthu Retd; Sr Adv Supreme Court, hosted by APLC

Mr. Justice (Retd.) 0:51:37

Mr. Justice (Retd.) S. Nagamuthu Sr. Adv. Topic: Child Marriages - Some Unsettled Legal Issues

Mr.Justice (retd) S.Nagamuthu 0:53:52

Mr.Justice (retd) S.Nagamuthu Sr.Adv. Extraterritorial jurisdiction of a HC to quash FIR, cri. P1

Justice S.NAGAMUTHU Lecture 2:32:26

Justice S.NAGAMUTHU Lecture on Criminal Trial - A Guidance (with Reference to Evidence Act)

Комментарии
Автор

I am very thankful to everyone for this video specially Mr Nagamuthu

InderSheelSatya
Автор

Very well spoken. Justice Nagmuttu is ocean in criminal law

APsingh-sci
Автор

The proviso reads that Police custody can be sought in parts for a total period of 15 days at any time during the first 40 days or 60 days as the case may be and not 60 or 90 days. Is it correct

T.S.Subramanian
Автор

Though Senior Counsel Mr. Nagamuthu given a good lecture being useful to all, regarding period of police custody, not analysed 167 property. First he failed to refer about 40 or 60 days. This is for what. Secondly on what basis he fixes total perid of police custody for 15 days. Such custody means both police and Judicial. No police custody after 40 or 60 days as applicable, but for statutory bail at the end of 60 or 90 days as applicable.
Listeners must analyse and discuss on this aspect.

kalaivanisudanthiram
Автор

If one can face cross, why one can't depose.
Even section 33 is sensible, but proviso in section 164 . Incongurrancy open.
What about leading question etc. Issues

sayasargam
Автор

So now, some intelligent mind will ask for hours of a day, this 15*24 equal 360 hours meaning 6 hour daily for next 60 days. Thus imagine the fate and accused fate.

sayasargam