Why Atheism Makes NO Sense

preview_player
Показать описание
Atheism has a foundation that is built on lies which leads them to false conclusions about our world.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

there are algorithms that do exactly that. they mutate data at random and evaluate for the best iterations and further mutate those solutions. they are called evolutionary algorithms and draw direct inspiration from the biological theory of evolution

paulvladislav
Автор

Don't US schools teach science any more? Where did all these ignorant people come from?

pyotrberia
Автор

Tell me you don't understand evolution without telling me you don't understand evolution

Squibblezombie
Автор

I love how these cultist keep lying about evolution being random
What I don't get are their followers that just accept them lies without calling them out, despite lying being agaist their cult
It's almost like they don't really take their own cult seriously

randomusername
Автор

Tell me you haven't opened a biology book, without telling me you haven't opened a biology book

psychoticplantlover
Автор

That's so funny that you mention a computer program, when there's literally a thing called "evolutionary algorithms" that relies on random mutations + survival of the fittest, and leads to fantastic adaptations.

ZantierTasa
Автор

It's crazy how easy it is to grift nowadays if you just have the slightest bit of confidence. Some nice clothes, a good camera, and some big words - you're golden. Just say whatever and wait for the idiots to gravitate towards you.

ryandavies
Автор

This is why religion should not be thought in schools

germanc-oi
Автор

As a former biochem student, this hurts my brain

JoostCraanen
Автор

He brings up genetic deceases and the argues for an “intelligent creator”?

CaptainFantastic
Автор

I'm an doftware engineer and what you've mentioned is a thing in software engineering. It's called "fuzzy testing". A special software mutated the source code (flips some conditions, changes some numbers) and then we run the test suite and check if the tests cover the fuzzing, if no test fail it signals us that we are missing tests (or otherbproblems with our code) which in of itself increases the assurance of an correct program.

larryd
Автор

He forgets natural selection, very convenient

tsadku
Автор

Let’s lie by comparing something like natural selection of traits with randomly shuffling computer code as if they are analogous.

If in fact the computer program had natural selection pressures and reproduced itself over and over with minor successive random code changes, it too would evolve.

Tinesthia
Автор

Is he wearing a chamois leather as a jacket?

bitghostnuts
Автор

Over Billions of years, yes. There are serious diseases that are caused by genetic mutations, they are detrimental, they are sad, but there are also genetic mutations that can be beneficial. For instance the ability to digest lactose from other animals was a mutation that prooved so beneficial that almost every human today has some tolerance to it at least until infancy. Approximately 35% of people retain that to adulthood. This mutation sprung up only roughly 2000 years ago. You see the big thing about mutation theory is it requires some selection bias to work (natural selection). Unfortunately pure random is not a selection bias, but if you randomize a batch of code, and SELECT the code that performs best, and you do this over the course of millions of years eventually you will get the exact program you're looking for. There are bad mutations, but there are good mutations, and natural selection pick apart the bad ones, from the good ones.

Gromitwashere
Автор

Calvin often trots out a series of logical fallacies coupled with a total lack of scientific understanding, but at least he usually uses a sensible (if cringeworthy) metaphor to back them up. This time, even the metaphor is wrong!

joshuakohlmann
Автор

Mutation doesn't create new nucleotides. It rearranges the gene hence altering genes sequence.

praisejesus-ps
Автор

How people can be blind so much that they can't see there's no intrinsic mutual exclusivity between idea of driving force (let's call it a God) and evolution as the way said driving force works.
I am not leaning one way, or the other. Just trying to comprehand reality as it can be observed.

MrPzyt
Автор

and yet more idiocy from Calvin. Curious how since he claims his god designed DNA, it fails so often. Is his god just stupid or is it malicious?

DNA is the result of evolution. It isn't perfect.

velkyn
Автор

Gotta love how anything science is called atheism.
Just goes to show what religion _really_ is.

klisting