The Mystery of Jesus' Lineage (Solved)

preview_player
Показать описание
Has the mystery Jesus lineage been solved? Why in Matt 1 does it say there are 14 generations from the captivity to Jesus when only 13 are listed? Why are the bloodlines in Matt and Luke different? See the unexpected answers in this video
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

When the reader saw the definite article missing from Joseph’s name, but present in all the others, it would then mean that this was not Joseph’s genealogy, but rather it was Mary’s genealogy. But, in keeping with Jewish law, it was the husband’s name that was used. Two examples are Ezra 2:61 and Nehemiah 7:63. Luke 3:23 records also that Jesus was only the “supposed” son of Joseph, but not in the ‘real’ line including Joseph. In Matthew we have recorded that Joseph is son of Jacob. How could he be called ‘son of Heli’ in Luke? In Luke it is not recorded that ‘Heli begat Joseph’, so the natural explanation is that Joseph was the son-in-law of Heli, who was a descendent of David. In English it is translated that Joseph was the son of Heli. However, in the Greek “son” is not there. It is incorrectly supplied by the translators, no doubt to make more sense, it was hoped. Yet, Joseph was called son of Heli, though son-in-law, in accordance with normal Jewish use. See 1Samuel 24:16 where David is called ‘son’ by Saul. We may safely conclude therefore that Joseph was the ‘son of Heli’ because he was espoused to Mary, Heli’s daughter.

The Jerusalem Talmud, Chagigah 2:4 refers to Miriam (Jewish name for Mary) as the daughter of Heli. In long-standing Jewish tradition Mary (Miriam) was recognised as the daughter of Heli. The absence of Mary’s name is quite in keeping with Jewish practice on genealogies and it was not unusual for a son-in-law to be listed in his wife’s (Mary/Miriam) genealogy.

In Luke’s genealogy Jesus is traced back through Nathan as the son of David. Thus Mary was a descendent of the house of David apart from Solomon, of whom Jeconiah descended. Jesus was Mary’s son, so He was of the Davidic royal line, totally apart from the curse of Jeconiah.

djebellawz
Автор

Tamar had twins by Judah...the Perez line is the one that ended but the Zerah line continued...so in reality the Davidic line did not end...Joseph was of the discontinued Perez line but Mary was of the Zerah line... even by adoptionthis was legal, binding, and indisputable this made Jesus of the line of David on both sides so that His lineage could not be questioned ...even by those that disputed His divinity...

patrickporco
Автор

Surely the Zerubbabel in Matthew and Luke are different persons - although their fathers' name happened to be Shealtiel, the grandfathers' names are different.

timothyng
Автор

Jer. 22:30. say "as if" childless. And. Mary's family was poor.

darant
Автор

plz dont put this music again
thank u

عوبيدياه
Автор

My Eth CEPHER Shows it Translated Correctly, No Mystery. MATTHEW 1:16 And Ya'aqov (Jacob) begat Yoceph (Joseph) the father of Miryam (Mary), of whom was born YAHUSHA (Jesus), who is called MASHIACH (Messiah). :)

cynthia
Автор

How are you liars gonna claim Jesus's lineage is a mystery when the Holy Word of God CLEARLY gives us His lineage? I followed this channel cause of old videos but it has clearly been infiltrated with liars.

尺尺Gaming-th
Автор

Man is Anthropos
Father is Pater

There is no where in the Greek where anthropos is translated MAN!

This is wrong!

Or please show one?

Morphwales
Автор

This video is HOW TO EXTENTS 3 MINS VIDEO INTOV17 MINS...
BRAND NEW IDEA BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH... I HACE KNIWN THIS FIR 5 YEARS. SONE OBE ALREADY DID A RESEARCH ON THIS. SO STOP SAYING BRAND NEW BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH...SHEESH.

unicornbunny
Автор

gonna talk about his lineage but have 100 pictures of white people lmao XD fail

jqowens