Principles of CRIMINAL LAW - Dean Joe-Santos B. Bisquera - BAR Examination - UM LAW

preview_player
Показать описание
Principles of CRIMINAL LAW - Episode 1 - Criminal Justice System-CONCEPT of Criminal Law-Montevideo Doctrine of a State-Sales Populi est Suprema Lex-the WELFARE of the People is the SUPREME LAW-General WELFARE Clause-People's Inalienable Right to Life, to Liberty and to Property enshrined in the Constitution's BILL of RIGHTS- Decisive Action vs Disruption of the Social Order-POLICE Power to serve the PEOPLE's General Welfare Clause-Formulation of State Policies to achieve the General Welfare Clause-Police or Regulatory Power-plenary power for the Legislature to enact Statutes to promote health, moral, education, good order, safety and the People's General Welfare-the State's Power to enact legislation can interfered with personal liberty or property to promote the General Welfare.
CLASSICAL vs POSITIVIST vs Eclectic Philosophy-Criminal Justice System-Legislative Department defines Sovereign People's Guideposts to Social Order and sanctions Social Deviants(criminals)-Executive Department is "Implementor" of the Sovereign People's Aspiration for an Orderly Society-Armed Forces vs External Aggression-PNP vs Internal Security-Department of Justice prosecutes for the PEOPLE vs Social Deviants(criminals) who disrupt the peace and the Social Order-the Judicial Department isolates criminals from mainstream Society, consistent with the Sovereign People's mandate. MAXIMS in Criminal Law - Doctrine of PRO REO-Actus Non Facit Reum, Nisi Mens Sit Rea- Utilitarian Theory-Nullum Crimen, Nulla Peona Sine Lege.
Crime Malum in Se vs Malum Prohibitum-violations vs the Revised Penal Code on an Act inherently EVIL or bad or per se wrongful-Crimae Malum Prohibitum on violations vs Special Criminal Law-Comparison:Offender's MORAL Trait-Good Faith as a Defense-Crime's Degree of Accomplishment-Mitigating & aggravating circumstances-Participation.
FELONIES-DOLO vs CULPA-Deliberate INTENT vs FAULT from Imprudence, Negligence, lack of Foresight & lack of Skill. Criminal Intent need not be proven to establish the Offense when (1) the crime committed was through CULPA or negligence, reckless imprudent (2) the crim is a Prohibited Act under a Special Law or Malum Prohibitum.
MISTAKE of FACT (Ah Chong Case) vs Mistake in the LAW-ERROR in Personae-ABERRATIO ICTUS-Praeter Intentionem-IMPOSSIBLE CRIMEs.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thank you, Dean Jo Santos B. Bisquera.🥰❤..God bless you always in good health!🙏❤🙏

marialilibethdellonardo
Автор

Thank you, Dean. Big help for me as a working law student. I listen to your lectures while working, I am more confident going to school after because I have more undestanding of the law because of your lectures.

carrenalim
Автор

Thank you for this lecture, Sir! Laws can be better understood when it is connected. Young generation of aspiring lawyers and ordinary citizen can learn so much from this! God bless you sir and your family. Excited to watch more videos from you, especially in Political Law.

AALkilohaastar
Автор

Thank you so much Dean. The lectures are very helpful

JomerLyCadiao
Автор

32:22 dati ayaw ko ng crim law… now dahil sa theory discussed by Dean, like ko na cya.. beautiful

lawstudent
Автор

Thank you for this informative and easy to understand discussion on CrimLaw atty. Joe-santos! You're story inspires me to push through this profession. More power and more blessings to you atty!

ryzo
Автор

Ang galing mo magturo Dean maraming salamat po dito sa mga recorded videos mo po.

calisteman
Автор

Hi Dean, your channel is unique where your contents have the academic rigor while you are able to carry some components of daily life examples to deliver the law concepts which made me understand clearly not just imagining it. Your sacrifice of your teaching career in order to deliver such high standard of teaching contents on YouTube platform is very much appreciated. 💯👍

jayragaquing
Автор

thank u, sa observation ko kau po nagawa ng video mo kasi very comprehensive, at gamay mo mga infos,

lawstudent
Автор

watching now atty at mamaya na ang aking midterm exam hehe

heyxx-cp
Автор

Thank you Dean. You are an inspiration po.

naji
Автор

Happy morning Dean Bisquera. My respect and gratitude for your time and hard work. . . Have a great day always Dean!!!

allannaryanadas
Автор

Than you po dean sa very informative lecture, magagamit ko to sa preparation para sa CLE

JeffreyCasimero-zw
Автор

Watching this while I wait for my turn for booster. Thank you po, Dean! :)

sairahm
Автор

thank you po Sir...sobrang helpful po sa akin

joyintopassion
Автор

Thank you so much po for always uploading a lecture on different subjects of law with a very comprehensive presentation. Halos po lahat ng lectures niu ay pinapanood ko ng ilang ulit, napakalaking tulong po ❤️❤️❤️❤️God bless you po, Dean! Sana po hindi kayo mapagod na mag upload pa ng mga videos 🙏❤️❤️❤️❤️

karenportes
Автор

Hi Dean, I am also from Bangued Abra po..I am proud to be ur kababayan..

donyrrejmangsat
Автор

You are really a Dean of Law. You are an expert in all law subjects, Dean Bisquera. Only few Deans of Law do what you are doing publicly thru your youtube videos. Maraming salamat po, learned so much from your clear and distinct legal discussions. God be forever glorified.
- Rey from Univ. of Negros Occidental-Recoletos School of Law.

reycfd
Автор

Thank you, Dean Joe for the new upload. :)

carloshamelon
Автор

Hi Dean Bisquera, Pp v Balmores G.R no L-1896 (1950) is about a falsified sweepstakes ticket.

karengalicia