Breaking Physics Using Math

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a slice of pie for yourself:
(In case the site don't work, use the direct link)

In case you'd like to support me:

my discord:

Other MAKiTs:
@MAKiTResearch
@mktcharity
@makitmovies
@makitshitpost

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

00:00 Intro
00:20 Introduction
03:09 Imaginary Time
09:04 Negative Energy
17:07 Imaginary Mass
21:17 Conclusion

[MAKiTHappen]

Okay, considering how many comments about this I've gotten... YES, 1/0 is undefined, HOWEVER, in both cases in this video we're talking about 1/0 from the positive side, which is approaching infinity, that's why right here 06:13 I said "Kind of infinity", and right here 13:16, I've added an equation which specifies this even more.

[valuerie]

"We're not here to be *reasonable*, we're here to do **MATH**" FINALLY SOMEONE GETS ME

[Verxinn]

Plugging extreme values in physics equations feels the same as making impossible scenarios in chess

[slowpnir]

Negative mass is funny, because it is at negative temperature, and when meeting normal mass, it tries to reach equilibruim. But since the correct order of temp is [0 K, ..., +INF K = -INF K, -0 K], both objects will try to accelerate to infinity.

[kellymoses]

From our perspective time is frozen for photons but from the photon's perspective Lorentz contraction causes the universe to be flattened to 2D so they have to travel 0 distance to reach anything.

[alejandroalzatesanchez]

19:49 "But this is a video for another time"
**Proceeds to publish the next video in the past**

[atismoke]

Not only did math break physics, it broke my brain as well

[arandomspaceenthusiast]

_i_ dollar foot long:

Robbert Sponge: Sandwiches at an imaginary value?
Patrick: Cities will burn.

[KimYoungUn]

Monday I will drive with -100 km/h to my work

[kellymoses]

Greg Egan wrote the Orthogonal (series) where the metric signature is (+, +, +, +) instead of (−, +, +, +) like our universe. This has PROFOUND implications on every area of physics. There is no upper limit on velocity and you can actually go back in time if you travel fast enough. Time dilation is reversed so that time travels FASTER for fast moving objects.

[MarshmallowRadiation]

The point about gravitational potential energy going to infinity as you approach the center of mass being okay brings up an interesting point about black holes. As you said, for a normal object the infinity that pops out doesn't really matter, because as you go inside the object, the parts of the object that you pass through end up canceling out. But in a black hole, specifically a model black hole where the density inside the black hole is allowed to go to infinity (it can't in reality, of course, but we don't know exactly why yet because we can't exactly look), _all_ of the mass would be concentrated at the exact point of the center of mass. And so if you have two black holes colliding, then the energy of those two singularities coming together _would_ be infinite. Of course, we don't see anything close to that, because all of that mathematically infinite energy is trapped behind the event horizon and can never ever escape, and it's probably not how it really works anyway, but hey it _is_ potentially closer to reality than this video makes it seem. Still impossible though.

[devrim-oguz]

Photos that have a negative wavelength being the same would actually make sense. Since in Feynman diagrams, you can interpret it as either going back in time or forward in time and the photon just acts exactly the same.

[-vibhusingh]

The 3 times I feel good after watching 2 unskippable Ads.
1. Watching a makit video
2. kurzgesagt video
3. My favourite series murder drones.
Great video BTW makit

[hdynamoisdawae]

“Imaginary mass”
the jjk brainrot… i can feel it…

[hindi]

breaking physics with one of the things it's made of which is math is like breaking a cookie using cookie dough.

[alexdefoc]

7:23 Just as punishement for going at c, you get frozen in time. Bro laking :))

[hqTheToaster]

Can you do 'Breaking Philosophy using Geometry and Group Theory' next? I'd love to see how a concept such as 'Supraenergy' breaks logic when plugged into the 'Platonic Concept' '''function'''. Thanks.

[slowpnir]

13:13 Yep, the gravitational force _under_ the surface of the sphere (due to Gauss law) linearly approaches 0 at the center.

[jan-Sopija]

"we're not here to be reasonable, we're here to do math" your so right and you should say that more

[slowpnir]

18:23 The full formula is E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2 btw, do not forget the impulse, which becomes more and more relevant approaching c (and the single factor for massless stuff).