How Top Champions are ranked in Raid Shadow Legends

In this video we do a deep dive into How Top Champions are ranked in Raid Shadow Legends.

Intro 0:00 - 0:59
Other Ranking Lists 0:59 - 2:20
Base Stats vs Multipliers 2:20 - 4:17
HH Grading Explanation 4:17 - 14:40
Finding the Best Damage 14:40 - 15:17
Top 10 AoE Damaging Skills 15:17 - 18:40
Top 10 Single Target Damaging Skills 18:40 - 22:40
Top 10 Damaging Skills for Clan Boss 22:40 - 25:41
Outro - 25:41

If you enjoy the content that we put out on this channel please be sure to subscribe, give us a thumbs-up, and check out our other videos

#raidRPG #RaidShadowLegends #HHGaming #Hellhades

[HHGamingNetwork]

Thanks for watching! if you are not already please take a second to subscribe to the channel, it cost nothing and helps us grow!

[ivorchandler]

Much appreciated content, as usual. Deep understanding of the mechanics helps us get more out of the game.

[modernthinker]

Appreciate this content. Thank you.
In future, it would be nice if content creators could evaluate champs not only for their ability to do damage, but for their other abilities in the game.
For example, saying someone like Angar is in need of a buff because Angar doesn't do significant damage.... this is a weak analysis. Angar's kit is amazing if one knows how to build and use him.

[xolnos]

Love the deep dives into the numbers and how its presented. You ever think of doing almost like a champion guide except focusing on the math/numbers behind it? such as Vogoth in regen gear vs curing gear or Kalvalax in different sets as his damage depends on the poisons / max hp. Showing how it effects the numbers on the spreadsheet. just a thought, keep up great work

[grizzledsentinel]

I very much appreciate the deep dive. Personally, I think your list of qualifiers lessens the ratings usefulness. I'd rather just have the range of low end based on the multipliers/base and then high end if all the qualifications are met and then people can figure out where they'll fit in that spectrum on their own. But it is always good to get the assumptions for a rating system out in the open so that people actually know what they are working with!

[galois]

I feel the category for Godlike is a bit generous. Most champions aren't viable anywhere past early game, let alone as nukers, so I think making top 15% is not that impressive. Top 1% is what I think should be god like. Probably the best would be to put raw ranking or how many times harder it is than the average.

[nerfballsootini]

Saph. These vids are legendary. Fantastic for the data nerds :thumbs:

[andrewcollins]

I think you are missing Shazar and Draco on CB ... their A1's hit incredibly hard with full de-buffs on the CB. My Shazar does 300k damage on UNM with his A1.

[jimboytres]

If Ninja's HP Burn was calculated in the damage for his A2, wouldn't he be top 3, if not #1, in terms of CB damage? I find mine to be hitting 200k+ with those included on NM.

[Neo_]

No saph, ... come on man.. Kytis, needs to be at half health.. its the champion that is renegade's twin, Deathless, that gets damage bonus for allies being dead.

[harryzimm]

These videos are both informative and misleading....example. Why is Royal Huntsman on the list? He can do great damage but would he perform better in Arena than a Faceless? Absolutely not.

These videos show baseline damage only. If you have a Faceless for example, I'd always suggest a F2P or mid-game player to build out that epic rather than the legendary Royal Huntsman. Because Faceless ignores shields as well as defense. Big boost, cheaper to build and should be easier to pull.

Bottom line. Watch these videos and apply some common sense, and test for yourself.