Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 & 35-150mm f/2-2.8 | Hands-on Review

Fast and compact, these new Tamron lenses are a welcome addition to any photographer's kit! You don't have to sacrifice image quality for these lightweight lenses. The 28-75mm offers a bright f/2.8 maximum aperture, improved sharpness, faster and more precise performance and more! The 35-150mm is a medium telephoto lens with a maximum aperture of f/2-2.8, quick and quiet autofocus, and more!

0:00 Intro
0:52 28-75mm f/2.8
2:38 35-150mm f/2-2.8
5:09 About Both Lenses
5:54 Outro

Shop @ B&H:

Subscribe to the B&H Photo YouTube Channel

Follow us on Social Media

#Tamron #CameraLens #ZoomLens

[BandH]

What would you capture with these lenses?

[bananabear]

The 35-150mm is the lens that makes a 2 lens solution possible . Bought that in no time once image quality is confirmed. The only area that it’s not good for is snapshots, giving it’s eye catching size. A revolution lens in terms of practically! Well done Tamron!

[airtyme]

I'd totally buy the 35 -150 if they made it for Nikon z cameras

[tecnolatino]

The 35-150mm seems to be a great lens but nowhere to be found.

[jbeano]

Preordered mine back in October from B&H so hopefully if theyre putting out a video about it then it means they have them and mine can finally be shipped out

[jaidenlee]

If you guys got them, finally mine should be shipping. Hopefully.

[lukerabin]

How about putting the mount in the title. As a canon user, none of the third party manufacturers have released anything I can think of for the last 18 months or so, while cranking out lenses for Sony.

[waterboy]

When will they be available for purchase?

[jorsetti]

will definitely buy this Z mount version!

[joseramos-dqsg]

Why so much review if they hardly even have glasses? The same thing happens with the lenses of the Nikon Z series that never arrive while all over Europe are already tired of using them. We look like a country from another planet.

[andrewareva]

Why would you need the 2875 with a 35150?

[photobatya]

Bought 35-150 first, did some commercial sport shootings, and it is hell heavy for 8-10 hours work. Recently worked on corporate event with flash in one hand and camera in another, and then bought 28-75. Now selling 35-150. Also It loses a lot of contrast capturing flares, for concerts it is annoying.

[dovidell]

why on earth can't lens manufacturers face a simple truth, that they need to produce a high end ( f 2.5 ) superzoom 28-200 to take on the APS-C (18-140) kit lens which is so much more versatile and practical, when it comes to carrying limited glass in ones hip bag ? - too proud perhaps ?

[spdcrzy]

Tamron blew EVERYBODY out of the water with this one. I have the ZV-E10 but I'm getting this lens next year anyways. Why? Because I have the Tamron 11-20 (16-30 FF) and an Sigma18-50 (24-75 FF) f/2.8 already. If I add this to my kit, I can cover the full frame equivalent of everything from 20-220mm (and then some), all at f/2.8 and around 55mm at f/2 for portraits with a minimum focusing distance of less than a foot from the front of the lens. That's just NUTS.

I'm wondering if Tamron is sandbagging, TBH. It looks like at this point that it's just an engineering problem (not a physics challenge) now to make a constant f/2 version of the 35-150, and Tamron just doesn't want to go there yet because of the chip shortage.

[photobatya]

I am glad I have sold it. Working with flash is impossible with this lens, so heavy is it. Neither on camera nor in hand. For sure it has bright aperture, but if you have low light scene at event, in most cases light pattern is not good at my eye, and you need to use flash anyway. And also it sucks tons of dust because of huge air volume inside, and it has no internal dust protection of any type. Also, it loses contast against light as hell.

[simonmaduxx]

Yeah.. where's the canon mount. A sweet lens i cant buy...