A Priori and A Posteriori (PHA pt. 3/38)

preview_player
Показать описание
  1. Apologetics Squared
Рекомендации по теме
A Priori & 0:04:56

A Priori & A Posteriori - Explained with examples

What are 'A 0:01:05

What are 'A priori & A posteriori?' - Gentleman Thinker

A priori, a 0:03:51

A priori, a posteriori, bedingte+totale Wahrscheinlichkeit, Bayes Statistik | Mathe by Daniel Jung

A priori und 0:14:11

A priori und a posteriori - Wichtige Begriffe der Erkenntnistheorie

A Priori vs 0:05:15

A Priori vs A Posteriori

Kant: Synthetische Urteile 0:14:07

Kant: Synthetische Urteile a priori

Prior And Posterior 0:02:20

Prior And Posterior - Intro to Statistics

A priori en 0:01:22

A priori en a posteriori: wat is het verschil? - Mr. Chadd Academy

A Priori Ne 0:05:22

A Priori Ne Demektir?

A priori i 0:11:11

A priori i a posteriori - Przybornik filozoficzny #2

A Priori and 0:08:10

A Priori and A Posteriori Judgments

What do A 0:04:37

What do A Priori / A Posteriori mean? | Philosophy Glossary

Immanuel Kant : 0:08:16

Immanuel Kant : A Priori’ and ‘A Posteriori’ Knowledge

Como usar 'a 0:03:26

Como usar 'a priori e 'a posteriori'? | Lara Brenner

Conocimiento A PRIORI 0:07:20

Conocimiento A PRIORI y A POSTERIORI (Español)

A priori and 0:01:02

A priori and A posteriori

1.1 Priori Analysis 0:01:48

1.1 Priori Analysis and Posteriori Testing

A Priori and 0:06:00

A Priori and A Posteriori Knowledge (BW L5)

A Priori and 0:02:28

A Priori and A Posteriori (PHA pt. 3/38)

Kant: conhecimento a 0:04:04

Kant: conhecimento a priori e a posteriori e juízos

PHILOSOPHY - Kant: 0:10:09

PHILOSOPHY - Kant: On Metaphysical Knowledge [HD]

Sixty second philosophy: 0:01:00

Sixty second philosophy: a priori vs a posteriori judgments

Two Distinctions: A 0:26:07

Two Distinctions: A Priori/A Posteriori, and Metaphysics/Epistemology

A Priori vs 0:06:35

A Priori vs A Posteriori Knowledge

Комментарии
Автор

Belief r made by 4 things stimulus, processing, experience, then context in this order

tennicksalvarez
Автор

It’s A pree-o-ree and A posté-ree-o-ree😭(as someone who learned latin it’s hard seeing/hearing people butcher the language like that😂) but let’s go, can’t wait to see where those leads.

meliodasv.f.
Автор

As someone who grew up watching Schoolhouse Rock, I take offence to the claim that there are "8 planets in the solar system."

litigioussociety
Автор

Last video I said I expect to disagree at some point in the 20s of this series. And then this video comes around with a concept that I am extremely doubtful about. I'll keep that in mind, let's see how essential agreement to the distinction between a priori beliefs and a posteriori beliefs is for the rest of the series.

photon
Автор

As someone without any "proper" knowledge of how those terms are used in philosophy and coming from a more mathematical/statistical background, something's confusing me me about this point:
Wouldn't "Something can't be green and colourless" be posterior to the base definitions of what a colour is? (i.e. Things can have colours, one of them being green. -> Something can't be green and not have a colour, because green is a colour, thus a green object has a colour.)
Similarly, "1+1=2" and similar things are posterior to the base definitions of numbers and sets (and *those* are what we have to just assume is true/agree upon a definition for, i.e. our axioms).
What are our fundamental axioms in this approach to philosophy? So far, from what I've gathered, it's our senses and maybe some sort of arithmetic axioms.

EDIT: I should have watched the whole thing before commenting. The torture thing adds another layer to it. There are moral axioms/"a priori" agreements included, too. I'm curious to see where this will lead, but unfortunately I expect it to end up being indirectly circular. I hope it isn't! I've been looking hard for a good, non-cyclical way to approach Theism, so it'll sit more comfortably with me.

melo.
Автор

Really? The knowledge of _"No plant is green and colorless."_ is an _"a priori"_ knowledge, because we know _"a priorily", _ that _"Green is a color."?_
How about a color blind person then? Would such a person also consider such a knowledge to be _"a priori"_ like you as a non color blind person are doing?!?

zsoltnagy