Science vs Pseudoscience w/ Thomas Kuhn

This video is part 2 of my series on the demarcation between science and its impostor. This video examines Thomas Kuhn’s notion of puzzle-solving as the marker of the scientific practice as an alternative to Karl Popper’s falsifiability. Stay tuned for more videos in this series as well as other topics in the philosophy of Science.

Support me on patreon

Also check me out on Facebook and Instagram for additional content.

[eleftheriosepikuridis]

And another interaction - may you be blessed

[eleftheriosepikuridis]

This is an interaction - I am engaged by this content

[eleftheriosepikuridis]

Thank you for doing this - very interesting

[theFirstMark]

So in the end we return to Dewey's "inquiry"?

[AdrienLegendre]

Kuhn was wrong, likely because, though trained as a scientist, he was a historian rather than a long practicing scientist. A scientist who merely does work well predicted by theory ()puzzle solving) will have difficulty publishing this science work because it is not interesting.