filmov
tv
Science vs Pseudoscience w/ Imre Lakatos

Показать описание
This video is part 3 in my series regarding the demarcation problem, that is “how do we differentiate between science and pseudoscience?” This video will cover the contribution provided by Imre Lakatos with his notion of “progressive research programmes” as an alternative to Popper’s falsifiability and Kuhn’s puzzle-solving.
Part 1: Karl Popper and falsifiability
Part 2: Thomas Kuhn and Puzzle-solving
Support me on patreon
Also check me out on Facebook and Instagram for additional content.
Part 1: Karl Popper and falsifiability
Part 2: Thomas Kuhn and Puzzle-solving
Support me on patreon
Also check me out on Facebook and Instagram for additional content.
Science vs Pseudoscience w/ Imre Lakatos
Science vs Pseudoscience w/ Thomas Kuhn
Science Vs. Pseudoscience pt. 4
What is pseudoscience and when is a claim pseudoscientific?
Popper on Science and Pseudoscience
Karl Popper's Falsification
Philosophies of Science
Popper on science and non-science
Science and Pseudoscience: a mini class with Bruce Hardy (Session 1)
Science vs. pseudoscience: How to tell the difference.
Post-Kuhnian Philosophy of Science: Imre Lakatos (1 of 3)
Chapter 1.4: Karl Popper and the logic of falsification
Philosophy of Science 9 - Research Programmes
Is neo-classical economics a pseudo-science? Interview with Dr Simon Skempton
Post-Kuhnian Philosophy of Science: Imre Lakatos (2 of 3)
Anya Plutynski: Rethinking Progress In Cancer Science And Medicine
The Popperian Podcast #5 – Maarten Boudry – ‘Diagnosing Pseudoscience - Why the...
Thomas Kuhn: Scientific Progress, Objectivity, and Theory Choice
Post-Kuhnian Philosophy of Science: Imre Lakatos (3 of 3)
Foresight in scientific method, by Hasok Chang
Imre Lakatos Quotes
Sometimes, Science is About Power
Philosophers Vs Sociologists SCIENCE WARS FULL EPISODE 4 (GATES)
Popper and Kuhn on Theory change — John Worrall / Serious Science
Комментарии