Canon EOS 1DX Hands on Review

Показать описание

While Canon may have a job on its hands to persuade EOS-1D MK IV users that they don't need the 1.3x crop factor and EOS-1Ds MKIII users that they don't need 21 million pixels, the EOS-1DX doesn't fail to impress.

It's also clear that Canon has listened to feedback about its pro-level cameras when it was designing the 18 million effective pixel EOS-1DX.

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

@CalebFilmsPresent the 1D is APS-H not APS-C sensor, so its 1.3x instead of 1.6x. This can make it more suitable for sports while keeping the quality.

Realestatedog

i like how they talked about 2 different cameras that wasnt a 1dx half the video

proffseterik

@SuperSilverdream She didn't say it doesn't replace them. She said the upgrade is not as straight forward as you may think.

ksearles

@fortgreene31 well now you have the 5D mark III, it depends really on a few things, how much you want to spend, what light your shooting in, how quick the action is.

RRAL

I'm disappointed that it doesn't have 2048*1080p recording (1/4 the max. of 1D C).

Crlarl

0:35
only 1.3x magnification?
Not 1.6x magnification?

CalebKam

I wish people would understand real differences between full frame and a APS sensor. An identical lens on either sensor produces an identical image. Same size, same magnification same everything except the APS sensor caputures less as its smaller. So ignoring the quality aspects of the sensors the image is the same. However, as the APS image is smaller it needs more magnification to produce the same size print. Hence the apparent magnification. BUT image quality suffers.

michaelhex