Extended Euclidean Algorithm (Solved Example 1)

preview_player
Показать описание
Network Security: Extended Euclidean Algorithm (Solved Example 1)
Topics discussed:
1) Explanation on the basics of Multiplicative Inverse for a given number under modulus.
2) Introduction to Extended Euclidean Algorithm to find the Multiplicative Inverse.
3) Steps and working of the Extended Euclidean Algorithm to find the Multiplicative Inverse.
4) Solved example to find the Multiplicative Inverse using Extended Euclidean Algorithm.
5) Explanation of how to verify the Multiplicative Inverse.

Music:
Axol x Alex Skrindo - You [NCS Release]

#NetworkSecurityByNeso #Cryptography #NetworkSecurity #ExtendedEuclideanAlgorithm
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

oh my god thank you sooo much for this explanation
, really help me to understand for my exam tomorrow, hope ur day will be blessed, always

aliamaisara
Автор

A point to be noted here is that if in final t1 we get negative ans then our final multiplicative answer will be (a+t1)

dbgohil
Автор

This method makes it so much easier to understand. Thank you!

alc
Автор

Sir please complete this series with RSA/AES/DES/and Deffie Helman

masterleague
Автор

I don’t know how many adjectives will throw for you.. Just will say Thanx a lot..

ryanreefat
Автор

Very clear method to get the multiplicative inverse

mikerowaveoven
Автор

The Extended Euclidean Algorithm taught seems incorrect. It gives the M.I. of 35 mod 3 to be 12. However, 35 × 12 = 420 which is divisible by 3, hence not 420 is not congruent to 1 modulo 3, hence 12 is not M.I. of 35 mod 3

architagarwal
Автор

Fun fact for this algorithm: the rule "A>B" is not neccesary, because the algorithm takes this into account by the way it behaves. For example if you have 3 mod 5 and take A = 3 and B = 5, then you get remainder 3 and quotient 0, so in the next iteration you would get A = B (which was 5) and B = remainder (which was 3). As you can see the algorithm takes care of that "point to ponder" by itself, you just waste 1 iteration tho

daviddugar
Автор

very clear explanation, thank you so much ✨

mohammadahmedragab
Автор

Even though you still speak fast😊😊.. . I love your teaching..🔥🔥🔥😊😊🔥💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿

danieldanmola
Автор

take A=modulo part, B=number part, ex: if we have to find MI of 20 mod 9 then take A=9 and B=20 then you will get correct ans.

SuccessAccount-cv
Автор

I’m offering a course in cyber security called cryptography and steganography.
Your channel has been really helpful!! So thank you!!

I’m about to write a test and I’m only able to easily find the mod multiplicative inverse with the use of a good scientific calculator that has mod function. In case Calculator won’t be allowed in the test, so I’m looking for easy manual way of finding the inverse.
But what I see here is scary!!

In one of my workings i need the inverse of 441 mod 26. Obviously there’s no time for this Method. If Calculator isn’t allowed in the test, I’m screwed!!

Mod multiplicative inverse is one such thing that shouldn’t be hard, BUT IT IS!!

cradleofrelaxation
Автор

It can also be used to find gcd of 2 co prime numbers if i am not wrong

shreyansh
Автор

Best Part.. This is not a mathematics class 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

supriyosaha
Автор

kindly add videos of DES/AES and the rest.

manishkarmakar
Автор

Thank you so much, this makes EEA so clear!

edwinsanchez
Автор

A small detail missed. If A > B then what we need to do?

aatif
Автор

sir, please make a brute force attack example video, as you have already made a video on this topic, but if you choose a cipher text, then convert it into plain text, it will be easy for us . Regards

iramshahzadi
Автор

Aap bhagwati hain mere liye. Thank you so much. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

salmanshahid
Автор

Stating A should be greater than B is very misleading and flawed. Because, taking your own example 3, the multiplicative inverse of 26 mod 11 is 3, while the multiplicative inverse of 11 mod 26 is 19. But when you say you assign the greater value to A, you're implying they would both be the same. And you can only find the MI of 11 mod 26 using your method, which a flawed and inaccurate method.

temexmichael