Airbus A220 vs Embraer E195-E2: E2 vs A220, which is BETTER?

preview_player
Показать описание
This video is about the Airbus A220 vs Embraer E2. A220 vs E195-E2, both Airbus A220 and Embraer E195-E2 are the largest most capable regional jets. The A220-100 is the loer end of Airbus A220, while E195-E2 is Embraer’s most optimized Embraer E2 version yet. Which is better? Tune in to this A220 vs E195-E2 video to find out!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I really like the E2 for its 2x2 layout.
A non-short flight sitting in the middle seat is just a nightmare to me. It doesn’t matter how many centimetres wider that seat is.
I hate having to negotiate leaving my seat AND looking out the window, while fighting for room on BOTH armrests.
COME ON ppl 🙄

I’ve never flown on the A220, but I tend to feel much less cramped if I’m not... trapped between two ppl 🤷‍♂️

rodrigorosatoalves
Автор

Couldn't finish watching because of the annoying music interspersed with large volume shifts between the music parts and the spoken parts.

cjohnny
Автор

For the regional service, E2.

it has the right autonomy, each version has its own wing, neither small nor large for better efficiency, lower noise level.

ACJ 220 if I were to choose only for longer, low-demand routes, where greater autonomy would be decisive.



The reports of the companies that use the E2 show that it exceeds the efficiency gain promised by Embraer in some points.

andersonwenceslau
Автор

As a passenger, I much prefer the ERJ aircraft with 2-2 configuration. Lots of room, no middle seat at all. A220 is configured 2-3, just like an old DC9, ugh!

DashPar
Автор

A220, high acquisition cost and high operating cost with the same revenue is the right formula for low efficiency. And even higher depreciation cost. All unfavorable.

wandersonclayton
Автор

EMBRAER 195-E2, because I'm brazilian 🇧🇷

allisonguidini
Автор

In regards to orders, the A220 family has more orders, since airlines chose the bigger variant. It really comes down to flexibility (long or short haul) and comfort. In this area the A220-100 wins hands down. However, I agree, if the airline's goal is a shot haul plane then the E195-E2 has a better cost per person on fuel burn.

JeromeDukes
Автор

VIAJAR ou PILOTAR o E2 é muito melhor do que o A220.... O resto das comparações são pela força do poderio econômico da AIRBUS

jr.robertoguedes
Автор

The a220 was meant to do regional and some out of country over the ocean work. The E2 is meant for what they said, regional services

thetransponder
Автор

The A220 is better as a hybrid between a regional jet and a standard short to medium haul plane (i.e. 737, A320). Meanwhile the E2 is better as a regional jet.

sorin_ea
Автор

i really like my brazil embraer but highlights are all top aircraft. samuel brazil

samuelsouza
Автор

More efficient, newer, cheaper.
E2 is an obvious choice

enzofranzinispina
Автор

I don't like the 3-seat row of the A220. The planes are similar but the E2 is quieter and longer and this allows it to have rows with 2 seats on both sides with practically the same number of passengers.

deniswarteley
Автор

I love the E2, not just because im brazilian.

ZRHTrainspotter
Автор

What you E2 supporters don't understand is that when Canadair/Bombardier gave their specs for a new "fuel efficient" geared engine to PW they choose a thrust ratio that would optimism speed and altitude performance. This increased the number of regional fights an aircraft could make a day, while also allowing higher altitude airports. They weren't idiots. They knew they already had a more fuel efficient engine so they asked what was more important, being the most efficient or being efficient and flexible. Embraer came along second and were already where known as the cheaper sticker price plane manufacturer and so chose the specs to keep that market differentiation. They have a plane with an engine that is cheaper to purchase (giving the entire aircraft a lower sticker price), more economical to fly, and slightly quieter than the other new quieter fuel efficient engine on the market. But it can't fly as fast, and can't fly out of some high-altitude airports. So it will make fewer short haul flights for you in a day into fewer airports and on long haul flights your customers will notice significantly longer flight times. If I was a new airline specializing in mid-haul flights to cheep holiday destinations I'd choose the E2. But if you're a big airline with lots of regional flights to fill a day the performance of the CSeries/A220 makes you much more money over the life of the aircraft. The reason the A220 only has a 1000 orders so far is because the other airlines who hesitated can't afford to wait for new aircraft.

mic
Автор

I really believe the Embraer E2 Jets are more better. It flies more distances, burns fuel more slowly, and it is more quieter.

albertdietrich-ramirez
Автор

The Company I work for just ordered 100 E195-E2. Can’t wait to fly

kyle
Автор

E2 is a regional jet
A220 is a medium range jet

E2 more fuel efficient-so it will do better on flights less than 2 hours

docvader
Автор

Airbus smallest jet or Embraer's largest jet? Let me know in the comments below! Thanks for tuning in and till we meet next week, Clear Skies Ahead!

oneskyflyer
Автор

Good comparison video but unable to enjoy due to louder irritating music in between as other videos in this channel.

akvinodin