On Julia Sets

In this video, I describe the difference between the Mandelbrot Set and the Julia Set fractals in relatively simple terms using demo software that I wrote myself. The mainstream description of the Julia sets is (in my humble opinion) over complicated when really it is quite simple.

Here is a link to the code I showed in the video:

Here is a link to my paper:

[FractalWoman]

Just so you know, I studied the language that they use in that Wikepedia page on Julia Sets. It's called Set Theory. In order to get my degree in computer science, I had to do a crap load of math, including set theory, which is REALLY HARD. I thought calculus was hard until I met set theory. The language of chaos theory is equally bad. This is because there were no computers around when chaos theory was conceived of and developed. They were trying to understand something that was nearly impossible to visualize without computers. I have studied the Mandelbrot Set, the Julia/Fatou sets the Lorenz Attractor (both 2D and 3D) the logistics map (which is one of the simplest chaos generators), iterated function systems and so on. Each one tells a different story. Each one opened my mind to a new way of looking at nature. Anyone that thinks that I didn't do my due diligence before I started making my videos DOESN'T KNOW ME.

All I am doing is SAYING THINGS DIFFERENTLY. I'm reworking the LANGUAGE. The physics is FINE. It's the language that's lacking. Relativity doesn't suck. The language of relativity sucks. Quantum mechanics doesn't suck. The language of quantum mechanics sucks. It is my opinion that these languages needs a complete do-over.

"There's always another way to say the SAME thing, that doesn't look at all like the way you said it before". Richard Feynman.

If a computer program is poorly written, it should we reworked, right? There's always another way to write a computer program, that doesn't look at all like the way we did it before. Think "Object Oriented Programming".

[FractalWoman]

I am a worker bee. I love having a job and I work hard. Today, I finally got my "liver scanner and tracking device" working. I call it LING for Liver Imaging Navigation and Guidance. This device combines 3D ultrasound and a mechanical tracking device to guide minimally invasive liver surgeries. It is REALLY COOL. And some day, it might even save your life. That is my day job. I'm so lucky.

[FractalWoman]

Another device that I "got working" was called BING (Biopsy Imaging Needle Guidance) which was geared toward prostate biopsies. BING was my "internal name" in that this is what my program was called. Eventually, a company licensed the technology and changed the name to Artemis. launched BING.com. Gnomesayin? Imagine if "this company" had called their product BING instead of Artemis? Imagine if I bought BING.com or BING.ca or BING.something ??? Gnomesayin?

[markwadsworth]

Your work is phenomenal! I see so many parallels between your fundamental physical/ mathematical basis, as well as your impressive novel theories, with those of the electric universe people that it begs comment. I wish you could collaborate with Donald Scott and Wal Thornhill at the EU using your mathematical mandelbrot set elegance and simplicity. Eventually do electrical plasma experiments with the Safire project engineers for validation... it would be awesome! With enough evidence, alternatives to the consensus (gravity) may be given proper consideration. Maybe you already are doing that and I don't mean to be insulting but I find you work very exciting.

[areyouavinalaff]

Julia sets are/is a new concept to me, broached during the "trolling the trolls" video. Glad to see this as a follow up, shall watch after I return from work today.

[jackdatrack]

its a fractal in a fractal in a fractal in a fractal in a fractal in a fractal in a fractal in a fractal in a fractal in a fractal in a fractal in a fractal .. and so on..lets start this fractal "religion" <3

[mattb]

I love your work and the way you really think outside the box....I think you are on to something here!