SUPREME COURT and AR15s Finally Happening? SOON! 'Assault' Weapons Maryland FPC Case will be the One

SUPREME COURT and AR15s Finally Happening? SOON! "Assault" Weapons Maryland FPC Case will be the One

#supremecourt #ar15 #2ndamendment

Join FPC

Join SAF

Bianchi v. Brown, Maryland Assault Weapons 2013 Law 4th Circuit Court of Appeals

Covered weapons:
The statute defines “assault weapon” as “(1) an assault long gun; (2) an assault pistol; or (3) a copycat weapon.” Id. § 4-301(d). The term “assault long gun,” in turn, encompasses more than forty-five enumerated long guns “or their copies, regardless of which company produced and manufactured” the firearm. § 4-301(b); see Md. Code, Pub. Safety § 5-101(r)(2). These proscribed guns include an assortment of military-style rifles and shotguns capable of semiautomatic fire, such as the AK-47, almost all models of the AR-15, the SPAS-12, and the Barrett .50 caliber sniper rifle. See Md. Code, Pub. Safety § 5-101(r)(2). The term “assault pistol” encompasses more than fifteen enumerated firearms and their copies. These include the TEC-9 and semiautomatic variants of the MAC-10, MP5K, UZI, and other military-style submachine guns. Md. Code, Crim. Law § 4-301(c).

(i) a semiautomatic centerfire rifle that can accept a detachable magazine and has any two of the following: 1. a folding stock; 2. a grenade launcher or flare launcher; or 3. a flash suppressor; (ii) a semiautomatic centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds; (iii) a semiautomatic centerfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 29 inches; (iv) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds; (v) a semiautomatic shotgun that has a folding stock; or (vi) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.

Wisconsin Ketamine Infusion Therapy for Depression and Anxiety, Reset Restore MD.
www.RandRMD.com

(PROOF) The RACIST History Of Gun Control Colonies + Early States [Part 1]

Defensive Gun Use ends in CRIMINAL charges: Learn the Lessons [INTERVIEW]!

(Interview) MASSIVE: Sheriff tells ATF NO will STOP ATF agents!

When do PARTS become GUNS and YOU go to PRISON: Law of Constructive Possession+Intent

0:00 - Intro1:09 - What's protected by the 2nd amendment?3:39 - The case7:15 - What is the end game?9:27 - 2020 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety11:25 - Real data12:58 - Where is this all going?14:22 - Quote of the Day

Attorney Tom Grieve is a former state criminal prosecutor from Wisconsin before eventually founding what is now the state's largest criminal defense firm at more than 20 attorneys. In 2019 the firm expanded into family law and added a dedicated team of professionals to further serve clients with similar aggressive and proven strategies.

Beyond the courtroom, Tom has been interviewed and appeared in numerous media outlets, ranging from the New York Times, CourtTV, Fox News, Reuters, Washington Post, National Public Radio, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, among many others. He is a frequent Continuing Legal Education course speaker to teach lawyers and judges in developments and the law, both in Wisconsin and nationally. Finally, Tom has also presented across the country, both online and in person, concerning the law and culture to the public.

Tom Grieve is recognized among the top Wisconsin and Milwaukee area lawyers. Recently named once again as a top Wisconsin criminal defense attorney, Tom was inducted into the “Wisconsin Rising Star” category by Super Lawyers (a nationally acclaimed attorney rating organization). He was also chosen as a "Top 100 Trial Lawyers" in Wisconsin by the National Trial Lawyers Association. Tom was also chosen for the "Top Attorneys of Wisconsin" by both Milwaukee Magazine and Madison Magazine.

Legal Disclaimer: nothing in this video is offered as legal advice or a formation of attorney-client relationship. If you want to hire my firm to be a client, you need to do just that and hire us... not watch us on the internet. If that offends your delicate sensibilities, just stop and be an adult. If you are outside of Wisconsin and want an attorney, contact one near where you are and stop trying to blame the internet and other people for your problems. This video is for educational purposes only and any clips or images shown are under fair use.

[bstrongable]

Most of us know what’s going on here anyway, still, shall not be infringed.

[Dakota]

This ruling begs the question, why does the state feel "military" weapons should be used against civilians for enforcing criminal activities.

[jonathanwilson]

If semi is more dangerous why can't we have fully automatic

[jpjp]

Why are they so determined to ban a weapon that is used so infrequently by criminals?

[ChristianConstitutionalist]

SCOTUS needs to outright rule that ALL Gun Control is UNCONSTITUTIONAL at one time.

[foofyguy]

Remember when NY tried to ban 32oz assault sodas?

[michaelfulcher]

Military style weapons are constitutionally protected arms. It's in the part where we have the right to form a well-regulated militia. A militia is a group of civilian war fighters. Militia members have historically brought their personally owned firearms to muster. To be effective as a group of civilian war fighters, they require the ability to arm themselves in a military manner.

[Kinetic.]

Where is my 240B? Where is my SAW? Where are my genades? Rifles are the least of military weapons

[MarineVeteran]

The end game is To restrict an inalienable right. Over trivial BS.

[DavidLucas-zqgb]

These people against the second amendment need to go to prison so they can live in a place where only the cops have guns. Whatever they do they need to stop advocating to have a prison built around us ALL!

[dk]

Corvettes can be dangerous and kill too. Some “people“ have them. Like the ones hiding documents in them.

[JohnShea-dx]

SCOTUS take notice; US law enforcement agencies have found and demonstrated that the semi-auto AR-15 is an excellant defensive weapon. The appeals court has lost its focus, the 2dA was not primarily about having the minimal weapons needed for personal defense but about being ready for collective defense of community using personally owned effective military capable weapons. Civilians have been hunting, target shooting and defending themselves with semi-auto rifles for more than a century. If the M-16/M-4 has about the same useful military capabilities as semi-auto rifles as implied by the appeals court, take the M-16/M-4 off the NFA. Criminals can kill people rapidly using most manually operated firearms when the victims are all unarmed in "gun free" zones. Are the political descendants of Red Coats plotting to return to "Lexington and Concord" to seize civilian weapons?

[Littlefoot.]

As an infantry marine I used full auto all the time because i wasnt a navy seal. By my crayon logic "You miss every shot you dont take" and "Ive got a round with your name on it and im gonna keep shooting until i find it"

[jaymore]

I find it strange how those who say we don’t need them are constantly surrounded by those who have them.

[socal]

The government deciding what kind of guns the people who pay their salaries and employ them can have. We The People should be on equal footing with the same people who are meant to protect us against those who would take away our rights.

[nickf]

So with their logic then all semi auto firearms will be seen as the same.

[scott]

So, where are military weapons prohibited in the 2nd amendment

[Roadiedave]

i will always fall back to my point that since the original 2A was against the threat of a tyrranical government, then tyrrany in general, and subsequently self defense. And that those engaged in illegal activities are not covered with or without guns, but with the caviat that under a tyrranical government anyone exercising their legitimate 2A rights would be a criminal by default under their tyrrany. Simply put "The people should have access to, and be as well or better armed as the government itself." So when Ol' Joe says the military has F-15's and tanks...I didn't stutter.

[voteholyk]

FPC needs to use the gun grabber language against them. Heller says you cannot ban an entire class of arms commonly chosen by the public. "Assault Weapons" are an entire class or arms that constitute 90% of the arms chosen by the public. So they cannot be banned. Just as well, we have no history of the government regulating the rate of fire of lawfully owned firearms.

[BGunBunny]

As an Illinois resident I am very interested in what happens in respect to those "15" styles of long ARms.
Thank you for the effort to keep us all informed.