'Galaxies Existed Before The Big Bang' James Webb Telescope Saw 15 Strange Galaxies beyond...

#jwst #webbtelescope #webbtelescopeupdates #bigbangtheory #bigbang #astronomy #galaxies #earlyuniverse #nasa

[homedog]

It baffles me that human intelligence has brought us this far in our ability to view deep space but we continue to elect idiots to run out government!!

[benevolencia]

It would be freaky if it turned out that one of those newly discovered galaxies was our own Milky Way galaxy, because the Universe is wrapped in around itself.

[rwesenberg]

Our theories are based on our observations. When our sight is limited, so are the theories. This is what makes a telescope like JWST so wonderful. So, our existing theories do not, in some areas, predict what we see. Wonderful! Now, we speculate, generate some new hypotheses, and see what they predict. Then, figure out how to observe and test those predictions. Neat, huh!

[christianfaust]

As you told, it's really a challenge but we face a deja vue. When Hubble looked roughly 100 years ago through his telescope with the highest resolution so far...he realized that our universe is more than the milkey way ...again we gave much resolution and we have again at the beginning of an observation more questions than answers

[garyfilmer]

Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, a theory proposed by Sir Roger Penrose, seems very compelling to me. The Standard Cosmological Model of the Universe is becoming increasingly challenged by the data provided by the amazing observations of the JWST.

[jcerban]

In other words, we're dumber than when we started.

[inthefreytoo]

"..The whole concept of how The Universe began may need a, 're-think.' .." The more we discover, the more we realize the things we just don't know....

[ericwhitehead]

If the universe is infinite, then how do we know Big Bangs are not occurring all the time, and these galixies we observe are part of other Big Bangs?

[ronaldkemp]

I've published books explaining how the theories and model to describe the universe from start to finish is wrong. In fact after I revised the theories used to explain the accelerated expansion of space on page 48 of the first book I wrote quote "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." Old massive galaxies in the early universe was accurately predicted by my revisions. That's odd. Astrophysicists don't know how to fix their equations to explain old large galaxies in the early universe? I not only fixed the equations but actually predicted that's what the JWST would find almost a year before NASA released the first survey, CEERS. I guess they can sweat it out before figuring out where they went wrong. Maybe, they won't figure it out? Or, they can just pick up a copy of the book SECRET UNIVERSE: GRAVITY I published before NASA launched the telescope. That will work too.

[kayak]

Amazing how so much we don't know about the universe when we think we know it all. I feel like a young kid again. So much to learn, unlearn. To live in this age of so many discoveries felt very spiritual to me. Keep it up humanity! You always amaze me. 😂😂😂

[bjornbjornson]

The film starts with "our universe..." which means our known universe. There must be other universes in an infinite space. Suppose the far away galaxes are part of another universe that is older than ours. The number of all universes all togheter are infinite. There is no beginning and no end.
I think, from my kitchen table, that the present knowledge of man kind is to primitive to really understand the problems of the universe. But there is one thing that is for sure. The the universe/space exists beceause it must. Nothing is not an alternaive.

[lokijordan]

If complex galaxies like ours were formed more than 14 billion years ago, then isn't it now a bit more plausible that some intelligent life might have evolved out there, way back when? [Are we intelligent life? Debatable. Noted.] And now *that* life or its remnants might be some 30 billion light years away. If such life survives, its complexity might be as unfathomable as the size of the Universe. That's equally frightening and wonderous. Nice time to be alive.

[westracy]

We didn't discover our first exoplanet until 1992. We're far too "young" to go about any scientific modeling without severe, objective humility.

[ehnzboi]

Great clip. Astronomy keeps showing us surprises.

[smhollanshead]

What if these very old galaxies are matter and debris from a source other than the big bang. What if this matter and debris predated the big bang? Or, this matter and debris entered our universe from another source? Would either of these possibilities explain the size and structure of these distant galaxies. The fact these galaxies are so far away from us in space suggests that they are also so far away from us in time.

[fredwood]

My son suggested that, because the Universe was so much smaller, back then, that such collisions that form galaxies were much more common than now and the stuff of the universe so dense that galaxies were bound to form and grow large. That makes sense to me.

[vgrof]

Fascinating! Somebody made a boo-boo. I do believe the boys will figure it out though. Hope I live long enough to see the answers.

[ronniebuck]

Science will NEVER be able to explain the WONDERS OF OUR HEAVENLY FATHER

[Slide]

I think there is a good chance we are seeing the edge of the previous big bang. I have always thought the big bang was a cyclic event.

[pastorrich]

I am excited that JWST is challenging preconceptions on galactic formation. The testimony it brings is no surprise to me. The Encyclopedia Galactica is about to get a major revision.