Heidegger - What is Worthy of Question (1957)

preview_player
Показать описание

#Philosophy #Heidegger
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Those days are close when this person will be deeply analyzed worldwide and his teaching and approaches will be highly appreciated.

haevinc
Автор

Heidegger knew that technology would lead humanity astray. He also knew that humanity would utilise such technology to lead humanity astray. The only way forward is for the human spirit to prevail technology. I understand his returning to Greek thought so much clearer in light of this.

H.J.G
Автор

The first part felt like one of Bergman's poetic monologues.
How did the postmoderns turn Heidegger's reverence for language into a cynical, nihilistic expression of the will to power? I feel strongly that his philosophy will become increasingly applied at a deeper level.

samn
Автор

It's always a pleasure listening to old speeches like these.

retardedphilosopher
Автор

What happens when computer code becomes the language of basic human literacy? Computer code literacy is becoming more and more generalized in the population. However, computer code is a language that is only an instrument and if sufficiently generalized would definitely bring Heidegger's warnings in this video about human beings becoming severed from truth to fruition. The philosopher and poet both use language not an instrument of daily life but as a medium to change how we question the world around us.

TK-fqwg
Автор

Rationality has become synonymous with incomprehensibility, and empirical evidence has become synonymous with money.

YOSH-KE
Автор

He may have had some nazi sympathies but his field was ontology not ethics. His thought is particularly relevant in an era of artificial intelligence.

aletheia
Автор

We have become obsessed with science, it has actually worsen the problem of Nihilism. Art is the only path towards a creative organization of Being (Polemos or the Will to live) for the sake of giving life meaning… but even art is suffering from this epistemological addiction for “objective truth”. Language must return to its most sacred use: to create beauty, instead of just being an instrument of info exchange or technological domination of the world.

EwingAmaterasu
Автор

The mind forms words and words shape the mind
To one, language is clay - solid - that must be fashioned into a vessel to hold thought
To another, it is flame to ward off fear
For another, rain to wash in experience
And for some, wind to carry the mind away

johnpayne
Автор

Philosophers still philophize but it will not be televised unless a kind sir on YouTube takes a risk.

bpatrickhoburg
Автор

and the ai came 2024. Heidegger's Gestell has trapped us deeper in the frame.

teugene
Автор

When philosophers still philosophised!

thelaughingphilosopher
Автор

I found worthy of question mr heidegger, that is, what is philosophy?,

kaboomboom
Автор

Es gibt keine dumme Frage, man hört die Philosophie Professoren immer behaupten. Nun, die dümmste Frage: warum existiert Etwas überhaupt anstatt Nichts?

JSwift-jqwn
Автор

The people who call Heidegger a Nazi aren’t smart enough to understand what he was REALLY up to.

SuperYTPmaster
Автор

Can this be taken as Heidegger signaling his inclination toward the Analytical school?

"Unterwegs zur Sprache" came out in 1959.

The Anglosphere finally breaches the Continental defenses.

MuhammadIzadi
Автор

Maybe if i talk with people of academia i will becoming the next heidegger, who knows, hes important to languange, because everyone didn't understand their own languange even wittgenstein say that me and other people have different indra/perception/realitation everyone not aware of their ignorance and their voice their communication, so then, you could example have the power within one night to dream seventy five years of time and then you say well thats was pretty great now lets have a surprise lets have a dream wilhich isnt under control you would come out of that and say well thats was a close shave wasnt it, you would dream the dream of living the life that you would actually living today, that woukd be within the infnite of multiplicity of choice you would have of playing that you werent god because thebwhole nature of the god inyou according to this idea is to play that hes not so in this idea then everybody is fundemantally not god in a politically kingly sense but god in the sense of bekng the self that feep down basic what ever there is and youre all that only pretending youre not.

kaboomboom
Автор

So he was a bad man. He was a genius too. Make of that what you will. Because he didn't neglect to encapsulate the latter in permanent form either.

Jide-bqyf
Автор

Heidegger wasn't a Nazi, he was just incredibly based.

ballshippin
Автор

"tHeRe ArE nO gOoD nAzI tHiNkErS"

jackraiser