Jack Smith’s New Indictment Against Trump DEAD ON ARRIVAL: Law Prof

Syracuse law professor Greg Germain explains why Donald Trump's election fraud case is dead. #jacksmith #trump

About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day's political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day's political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country's most important political newsmakers.

Follow Rising on social media:

Website: Hill.TV

Instagram: @HillTVLive

Twitter: @HillTVLive

[jnsgetachew]

I like how Jessica said, Trump's lawyers delayed the case. No, no, no, Jessica, the government waited 3 years to bring up these charges, okay?

[ThaGirlLaLaLa]

Is it not painfully obvious that they are falsely accusing a political opponent for doing exactly what they are indeed doing?

[jasonwells]

A vote for Kamala is a vote for Garland, Bragg, Mayorkas, and the rest of the swamp dwellers.

[melissamurray]

Why wait until Trump was running for reelection to indict him? Didn’t they have three years to do this?

[williamdavis]

Jack Smiths wife works for the Obamas. She is a documentary filmmaker for Netflix. This is a conflict of interest.

[johnwalker]

Jack Smith knows his time is short, he's desperate!

[chrisbell]

It saddens me that half our country is voting for Biden and now kamala. Its like they want americans to fail.😢

[GeorgeSnyder-uh]

And should be, Jack Smith, what a LOSER!

[wackowacko]

This is a fishing exhibition and deliberate election interference. This is the problem with what Jack is doing.

[JamieCohen-hi]

Even this case aside (though this certainly exemplifies the need), something needs to be done to mitigate state and federal judicial systems’ filing of lawsuits that do not hold up in higher courts. At bare minimum, they should be held responsible for defendants’ attorney fees on cases overturned/lost upon appeal/retrial.

[dimassalazar]

Hope Jack Smith and Merrick Garland share a cell one day.

[Mahen-jc]

Let's be clear ..no matter what the scotus said ...jack Smith would have gone ahead...it's not abt find him guilty but for dems to say HDe has been indicted ...well done scotus

[GregGrant-fzgh]

This guy needs to be jailed for charging Trump for the same thing.

[paulweeldreyer]

The Supreme Court was right to leave the question of "what are official acts" vague. That's how higher courts work. They don't rule on questions which have not been decided on by lower courts.

In this case, lower courts need to interpret "official acts" for themselves, then those questions will end up back with SCOTUS. I question this guy's legal expertise. And it was always a huge stretch to think this would be adjudicated before the election.

[Hellowakeup]

Law-fare is apart of our democratic process.
-Democrats.

[Cyrenna-jg]

Give it up smith you’re losing every time

[jimfesta]

I'll bet Jack Smith is getting all kinds of help from outside the justice department in his unending quest to get Trump.

[jamesmilligan]

Trump has the right to question the votes

[randymilan-williams]

His view requires a clairvoyance beyond any courts ability.

[ChrisR]

There is a reason why the Supreme Court ruled that his intent doesn't matter, and that reason is because you wouldn't be able to prove his intent anyway. Intent is a state of mind, it does not leave much in the way of physical evidence. Unless you luck out and someone outright states their intentions, you simply can't demonstrate what they are, especially if you are trying to prove they are not what has been stated.