Debate: Religion's Impact on Society - Christopher Hitchens vs Nigel Spivey | Intelligence Squared

preview_player
Показать описание
Join the thought-provoking debate from 2007 as Christopher Hitchens and Dr. Nigel Spivey discuss the role of religion in society. Hitchens presents arguments on the challenges and negative consequences of religion, while Spivey defends its historical significance and impact on art and culture. Explore the question of whether a society without religion can maintain its aesthetic emotions and warm human connections. Don't miss this intriguing clash of ideas!

Want to see more videos and virtual events?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intelligence Squared has established itself as the leading forum for live, agenda-setting debates, talks and discussions around the world. Our aim is to promote a global conversation that enables people to make informed decisions about the issues that matter, in the company of the world's greatest minds and orators.

Follow Intelligence Squared on:

#religiondebate #hitchensvspivey #societyimpact #atheism #religiousculture #christopherhitchens #nigelspivey #intelligencesquared #intelligencesquaredplus #iq2
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Astonishingly blinkered opening from Dr Spivey, who makes no point other than "45, 000 years ago we started to fill in the blanks in our understanding by imagining solutions", as evidenced by archeology. Compared to Hitchens succinct and deadly assessment of the reality of religions and their effect on society, this was not a 'thought-provoking debate'. Let's just vote now, and go to the bar for a drink.

michaelpatterson
Автор

Well the basis of the big world religions is the belief in the existence of a god. So Dr Spivey's introductory sentences already remove the rug from under the feet of said religions.

Arsenic
Автор

I admired Christopher Hitchens. I don't think he laid down methods of atheistic philosophy and simply reduced to careful examination of existing sectarian practices. Regardless he was an intellectual who will be reviewed perhaps centuries later when humans would know more about their universe.

kumardigvijaymishra
Автор

Hitchens: Religions harm society by being used as a justification for violence and dehumanizing those who don't subscribe to your particular brand of worship.

Spivey: I assume that burials and art were caused by religion, therefore religion is beneficial. I ascribe all art to religious fervor. I claim that the entire argument that religion is a mistake is based on ancestors making scientific errors and explaining things using religious beliefs, not on any modern observed effects of religion on society.

I say: there's a big difference between faith and organized religions.

annj.m.s.harlan
Автор

The modern B or not to B equivalent of a Hamlet's speech :)

tehdii
Автор

Hitchens died a couple years ago. So why is it being posted as a new discussion?

nancyreyes
Автор

Both did a Very Good on the Subject. Intelligently Brief and to the Point ! !

kenhuang
Автор

Excellent🥂

I forward to the day we hold dialogues about how we could end the suffering during this time of unending global chaos and how ethics, morality and (God’s) love could contribute to world peace.

The potential for the Kingdom of God resides within us🕊️🪷🙏

MoralScienceEducation