TOP 7 Most Dangerous Aircraft You Can Still Fly

hey guys these are the TOP 7 Most Dangerous commercial Aircraft You Can Still Fly. I have chosen these from mechanical failures and not human error. I also looked at the crash rate per flight. Hope you enjoy the video:)
If you would like to donate to me directly via Paypal heres the link !!! :))
Sources:

Related tags:
dangerous planes,TOP 7 Most Dangerous Aircraft You Can Still Fly,Most dangerous planes in the world,most dangerous aircraft in the world,most dangerous airplanes in the world,dangerous aircraft to fly,Daily dose of aviation,Most dangerous planes to fly,Most dangerous aircraft to fly,dangerous aircraft,dangerous commercial aircraft,worst commercial aircraft,dangerous commercial airplanes,worst planes ever built,plane crash,airplane crash,dangerous airlines

-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Check out my new merch!:

It would mean a lot if you donated, it would bring me closer to my goal of flying lessons :)

Join this channel to get access to cool perks!:
-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-

[DailyDoseofAviation]

**IMPORTANT it would mean so much if you subscribed since I'm saving up for flying lessons and youtube could help me into that direction:)

[fuzzwork]

The DHC-6 twin otter isn’t inherently dangerous, but its STOL and rough field capability means that it is frequently used in much more marginal circumstances than other aircraft, resulting in more accidents. Edited for spelling

[codyviera]

The Tupolev plane is absolutely gorgeous. That thing looks so slick.

[bytefree]

DC-9 and MD-80 logged billions of hours in the skies pretty reliable airframe proven design. If it somehow made up to this days in service, no way this planes are insecure at all. Try to wegith the accidents taking account the units produced, cycles and hours flying. MD80 wwre regionals, so they put insane number of cycles with short flights in between. Once more, nothing but relaible airframe. Accidents ?. Sure, like any other jetliner on the same period with even less sales.

[vbscript]

"USA Jet Airlines" is a cargo airline. You can't fly on their DC-9s unless you're a pilot (or maybe loadmaster or some such thing.) The last U.S. passenger airline retired their DC-9s in 2014. And the MD-80s and MD-90s are being retired next month (retirement of the last few frames pushed up a year or two due to the COVID-19 crisis, but they were already in the process of retiring them anyway.)

Also, there hasn't been a fatal crash of a DC-9 or an MD-80/90 by a U.S. carrier since the 1990s. It's actually a very reliable airframe and Delta TechOps maintains them very well. The reason for the relatively large number of fatal crashes compared to other aircraft still flying is just that the type has been around a long time and commercial aviation as a whole was much less safe back then than it is now.

There has been exactly 1 passenger fatality on all U.S. mainline carriers total since December of 2001. And that was due to the passenger being hit by a piece of an engine inlet that blew off during an engine failure. The last actual fatal crash of a U.S. mainline carrier was the A300 that crashed in Queens in late 2001.

[joaquinlezcano]

Half of them aren't even dangerous. Being mass produced means they have higher chances of accidents. And most of them weren't even the plane's problem

[thegamebakery]

The MD-80 actually has an amazing safety record if you consider that over 1, 000 we’re built and they performed hundreds of thousands of flights safely. As for the DHC-6 and other STOL aircraft, they normally operate in less-than-perfect conditions and airfields.

Despite that, great video there! Well done!

[MagnumOpusSRT]

Should use number of passengers flown / number of fatalities.
Wrong metrics used.

[mikeletaurus]

Your data analysis needs work. The DC-9 might have had 10 fatal crashes, but out of how many planes total (hundreds were manufactured and sold to airlines)? How many flight hours? Flight miles? Do you see my point?

[AllanBrogdon]

I worked on the MD-88 and saw one that flew through trees when the altimeter was set wrong. It had tree limbs sticking out of bot engines and the space between the leading edge and the slats. It landed and was repaired. This video has no context.

[Columbine-enqc]

2:03 wow, they almost overran that runway :O

[lotusamg]

2K subs a day after the 1K Subs Video, haha. As a new sub, i'm looking forward to see this channel grow further and i'm really enjoying the content, keep it up!

[ПроститееслиобиделЯсваминесогл]

Tupolev is nice plain, video u shown is about plain that wasn't flying for a long time and wasn't checked correctly before flight

[Just-water]

Ryanair: I’ll take your entire stock!!!

[snowcoolwhite]

NOW YOU DONT SAY THE TWIN OTTER
The Twin Otter is a super good plane idc if it had fatal crashes it can take off anywhere and land anywhere its also just amazing HOW COULD YOU NOT LIKE IT
Edit:Dont mind my reply i forgot you could edit

[nicoshmico]

Are a good amount of these crashes pilot error tho?

[owenklein]

Watching a Tu-154 takeoff makes me cringe because of how unstable the gear tilt is.

[kelcritcarroll]

This dosent give me any info except how many crashes a plane has had. This may not be the planes fault…possibly the company, pilots ect.

[phishbill]

With the Twin Otter, DC-9, and MD-80, you are conflating the number of accidents with the huge numbers produced. Better homework next time, please.

[headsetlucky]

Liked the video liked the info. Hated the title. Where some of those Canadian and Russian planes are used cause nothing else can make it on those routes.