Supreme Court rules on EPA emissions limits

preview_player
Показать описание
In a loss for the Obama administration, the Supreme Court ruled that the EPA unreasonably interpreted the Clean Air Act when it decided to set limits on the emissions of toxic pollutants from power plants without first considering the costs of the industry to do so.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Just love all the carbon based lifeforms trying to get rid of carbon.

DutchStar
Автор

A win for the little guy. This will bring down electricity bills for people who are having a hard time because of the stagnant economy.

captainbillshatner
Автор

the problem with this world today. Money over everything. Even saving the planet people are bitching about money. Sad world we live in

TheDudeMaaaan
Автор

Yeah, more pollution..That we get to pay for with our health & lives! Ultimate corporate profit at any price!

JamesSmith-swnk
Автор

raping mother earth for oil and all her glory even though she is groaning in agony already...smh...

PapayaPepper
Автор

It's okay the tax payers will pick up the tab! Big companies will not go green at a loss or even loss of profit percentages!

aforeffort
Автор

Of course the vote was split along partisan lines, with the 5 right-wing judges on the side of toxic polluters. Clean air and water should NOT be a partisan issue.

EeroHaapala
Автор

Money isn’t real people, our planet it 😂

Seanfones
Автор

How many Jewish judges are in Supreme Court?

Hamadoman
Автор

As long as corporations continue to turn a profit, who cares about the public's health. *sarcasm*

ominous
Автор

simple concept basic logic if life is not free why the hell would death be any cheaper it's not. So the question one may wonder is the spiritual cost to one's own soul and spirit for having lived and died to the lowest standards of quality for so many years now global pollution has diminished the quality of life to the point where today's people are living, dying and yielding the worst spiritual kickback that has ever been manifested since the beginning of life only getting worse. The polar opposite extreme to that is today's people should be living and dying to the highest standards of quality which would make each and every moment physically, mentally, financially and spiritually beneficial. S.R.F.

jamesfiaco
Автор

How could they possibility think, in the face of climate change, that this was a good decision?

doodelay
Автор

the cost of the industry vs the cost of our lives

PapayaPepper