Overturning California Ammunition Background Checks Update Rhode v. Bonta

preview_player
Показать описание
California is due to give their historical evidence to Judge Benitez in Rhode v. Bonta, previously Rhode v. Becerra. Judge Benitez who has most of the big cases in California currently before him didn't seem to believe the evidence exists but gave California 30 days to come up with something. The state now has exactly one week left in which time we could have some good news.

Social Media

Check out my Merch, Shirts, Mugs and More!

NOTICE: I am "NOT" a lawyer, and this should not be considered legal advice. These are my opinions.
(DISCLAIMER: This post may contain paid advertisements or affiliate links. What is an affiliate link? It means that if you click on one of the product links, Copper Jacket TV will receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support the channel and allows awesome future content. Thank you for the support!
DO NOT try anything you see in this video at home. All work should be performed by a trained professional. Disclaimer: These videos are strictly for educational and entertainment purposes only. Imitation or the use of anything demonstrated in my videos is done AT YOUR OWN RISK.. These videos are free to watch and if anyone attempts to charge for this video notify us immediately.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thanks for watching. Subscribe for more.

CopperJacketTV
Автор

The 2 Amendment, the only right applied differently from state to state.

texture
Автор

Kicking the Can down the road 🛣️ This will never end. Imagine if California worked this hard to resolve the Homeless Population. 😮😮

freedomridermorty
Автор

Bad news guys, both of my local gun stores are being forced to close because they can’t afford to buy all the new surveillance equipment required by California to sell fire arms.

kanaancross
Автор

California has always known that these restrictions are unconstitutional. They continue on this tact to just prolong the legal process. They know that it takes years for lawsuits to work through the courts. The longer they can delay litigation the better for the Democrats that run this horrible state!

michaelsanbornsniper
Автор

I never understood how California could keep us from practicing rights that many other states can do everyday.

charlieowens
Автор

I want a refund for all the fees I’ve paid to the state to purchase ammunition.

chriskaldunski
Автор

SO, IN OTHER WORDS, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING HAS CHANGED.

aquariumdude
Автор

I hope we win this case its totality unconstitutional.

short-fuse
Автор

The mere fact that you have to pay for a background check to buy ammunition should be enough to overturn it.

godoy
Автор

Appeals after appeals after appeals after appeals all the while no injunctions. And our rights are delayed even moreso... FREEMEN DO NOT COMPLY!

madcapmagician
Автор

An ammo update video. Video runs for 5:56. I see what you did there.

Автор

I’m a South Dakota resident. I tried to purchase some 22LR rimfire when traveling in California. They could not sell it to me because I was a non-resident. How messed up can one state be? I should have put in an order to a homeless person to go in and steal it for me.

Doc.Holiday
Автор

Additional fees and steps is the same thing as having a poll tax or poll exam. Both of which have been shown to be UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

SithScorp
Автор

If overturned the tyrants will appeal.

deniseprettner
Автор

A couple of hundred prohibited persons have be stopped, but hundreds of thousands have been denied sales. California

mikelyon
Автор

The background check itself is unconstitutional whether or not there was a false positive. I’m worried that we’ve set up a situation where they may let it stand if California approves it system. That’s not a good outcome.

frankmccarthy
Автор

"WELCOME TO THE HOTEL CALIFORNIA! WHERE YOU CAN CHECK OUT ANYTIME YOU LIKE BUT YOU CAN NEVER LEAVE!"
- The Eagles
EVERYBODY, SING ALONG! 😂

aquariumdude
Автор

*California wasn't even a state in 1791; it's impossible for there to even have been an historical analog of an ammo restriction at that time.*

JohnDoe-zlqw
Автор

Is Benitez ever going to issue a ruling on the assault weapon and magazine cases? Been waiting for six months.

montecraig