NY:BUILDING COLLAPSE:WITNESS-HEARD EXPLOSION

[bradmomohara]

Propaganda at its finest. You tube scrubbing videos supporting explosions over the years. So many videos I cant find that were so easy to find just a few years ago.

[kelliv]

There is a website where demolitions experts explain the physics of how those buildings came down and it absolutely was not plane impacts. Explain the lava under the rubble and the extreme heat that lasted for half a month...

[trevordavis]

It genuinely concerns me how many people actually think this video is of the twin towers. Like those 2014 to 2018 model year vehicles in the background were definitely there on 9/11/2001 oh, and that iPhone 8 was definitely there in 2001

[egonschiele]

This is insane that we will never know what actually happened on that day.

[onlinecomment]

Have you ever seen buildings demolishing? It’s such a complex job to set everything up so it wouldn’t collapse on top of other buildings and destroy everything on its way. This one collapsed right under. Do you think terrorists that fly an airplane into a building that want to spook the US government care about preserving life AROUND the building? This building collapsed right under. You’ve got to have access to all the engineering and construction of the building to carefully place bombs in the right spots to achieve such precise collision. Let alone, hijacked planes that change radar are followed up by military aircraft wayy before they hit NYC city. You can target commercial aircrafts GPS systems to change their route, there is no way the pilot was so skilled he could’ve just found the Tower by its own sights whilst flying. Besides the fact that the time between first Tower attack was aired for over 10 minutes, which would’ve made it way easier to stop the second aircraft from landing into the second building. The US government had to cover up for this in order to justify their 10+ year “fight against Oil countries” and introduction of american soldiers and the ISIS propaganda they had created later on to support their actions.

[ExtremeSal]

The fact that people think this shit is from 9/11 genuinely concerns me

[ammebee]

Remember when internet censorship was this crazy elusive thing only China did. What is happening to America?

[brians]

Flight 11 crashed through Floors 93 and 99, LEAVING ONLY 10 FLOORS WORTH OF STRUCTURAL WEIGHT PRESSING DOWN on the damaged, burning section of the North Tower. Newtonian physics from centuries ago dictates the energy needed to destroy the below 93 stories isn't available without controlled demolitions. No plane touched those floors. So what should have happened in Newton's world is the conservation of momentum would have had the top 10 floors slide off the top of the building, leaving roughly 90 floors in tact below. There's simply not enough force or energy in those top 10 floors to pulverize the bottom 100.

[echeaz]

"The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse.
The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the NEAR-SIMULTANEOUS FAILURE OF EVERY COLUMN IN THE BUILDING." [emphasis added] -- A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 by J. Leroy Hulsey, Ph.D., P.E., S.E., University of Alaska Fairbanks, Zhili Quan, Ph.D., Bridge Engineer, South Carolina Department of Transportation, and Feng Xiao, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Department of Civil Engineering. "This report presents the findings and conclusions of a four-year study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) — a 47-story building that suffered a total collapse at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001...."

[takumifujiwara]

the amount of people claiming 9/11 theories in these comments is ridiculous considering this has nothing to do with 9/11

[tylerbreisacher]

I'm pretty sure this is about an incident around the time this was posted, so April 2016, but it comes up if you're searching for 9/11-related videos, so it's not surprising that people assume it's about that!

[HawkbitAlpha]

Good lord, these comments are unbelievably stupid. Posting 9/11 conspiracy theories on a video (posted by CNN themselves, nonetheless) about an incident in 2016, not realizing it's not even 9/11 related, is such an epic self-own for all of the self-styled research and truth bros.

[chookin]

Those towers both vaporized before they hit the ground. Dr Judy Woods nails it in her anaylsis. Some exotic weapons were used to make this happen. You can see steel turn to dust in mid air.

[tombarlow]

i was there and there was no explosion. It had been burning since 10 AM. Seven hours! We ran from the cloud up Greenwich St. No explosive sound. Just popping of windows as it started to collapse.

[alexcunn]

Hearing an "explosion" would be expected moments before collapse. At some point certain parts of the structure would start taking the weight from the other parts that have failed. Shifting weight makes a loud sound, like when you stomp on the floor

[slepton]

But NIST said no explosions that day lmfao

[adamyunt]

Uuuuh, woke you out of your sleep, huh? So basically you heard the loud crash of the plane smashing into the tower.

[TobiasRockingfeller]

Why are people talking about the twin towers??? Read the description

[clavd]

"The impact of the explosion.. it was extremely loud"
Government "no you didnt"

[travishillsthedarkangelbun]

why is this recommended to me when looking up World Trade center?