My Wife Staged Her Murder And Framed Me | Conviction: Murder In Suburbia Episode 1 | Absolute Crime

In this BBC Two Documentary, Inside Justice look at the case of Glyn Razzell, who was convicted of killing his estranged wife Linda, even though her body was never found. The most damning evidence was the blood – her blood – found in the boot of the car he had been driving. Glyn points out that the blood was found only on the third time of searching, and asks how the police could have missed so many spots on two previous searches. He says the blood could have been planted, and that Linda staged her own disappearance. For the past 15 years he has maintained his innocence.

Absolute Crime is your go-to channel for the best crime documentaries. Subscribe for your weekly dose of crime shows, serial killers, thieves and prison stories.

From: Conviction: Murder In Suburbia Episode 1

#TrueCrime #Documentaries #CrimeDocumentaries

[mollyfenn]

“He gently pushed her to one side” “ she fell through a glass door” 😮😮😮

My father died at the age of 84 my parents hadn’t been together since my father was 50 years old by the time of his A month before my father died he was still lying about his DV behaviour with my mother forgetting I was there I’m a witness & I was one of their victims .

[jh]

Just because you don't find the body doesn't mean you are innocent.

[fairmaiden]

Don't forget that theres been plenty of others who were respected by the community who have been "innocent" of killing even their whole family, when they were guilty all along

[jayoopatwardhan]

Wonder if his friend was ever questioned, whose car it was ?

[frontenac]

*A "lie detector test"? Is that woman serious? Why not organise a séance with a medium to find the body while she's at it?*
🙄 *Holy cow!*
🤦🤦‍♂🤦‍♀

[BellaLeoLicorice]

Everyone is against him, everyone ser him up. Liar liar pants on fire

[MrMarco]

The problem with Halliwell being the culprit is how could he have planted Linda's blood in the car being used by Glyn Razzell? In fact, how could Linda have planted her own blood in that car? When did either have access? If either did gain access, how could the police not be aware of that? Glyn has suggested that Linda ran off to start a new life but the chances that Linda ran off and left her children and framed her husband are almost zero. When a woman disappears it's always mentioned that maybe she ran off. Always mentioned but rarely true. Glyn has suggested that she ran off because he knows that he's innocent and that leaves him with no other options except to think she ran off to start a new life.
We have a situation in which the husband has no other options but to suggest a very unlikely scenario. The odds are very high against that and in fact, she didn't run off. Linda would only have planted the blood in the Renault if she had run off, she certainly couldn't have planted it if she's deceased. Therefore, she didn't run off and she didn't plant the blood evidence. That leaves us with this; Linda is deceased and either the police missed the blood in the car twice or someone planted it there after the first 2 police inspections of the car. It makes sense that Linda is deceased since her blood was found in the Renault, but we're still left with a mystery. Who put the blood in the Renault?
This is where many cases come to a screeching halt. There was Linda's blood in the Renault but I'm certain that her husband didn't put it there, nor did he kill Linda. He couldn't have driven to her place that morning and bypassed all of the cctv cameras, and it's likely someone would have seen him there. That leaves us with the police. The police searched the Renault twice and found no blood. An excuse was provided, it was dark and there was bad weather when the first search was conducted. They used a special light that works almost as well as luminol. It shows brightly on a spot of blood, being dark outside wouldn't make it more difficult to see, it would be easier to see in the dark.
The 3rd inspection produced one stain out in the open on the carpet of the boot, several small spots around the walls in the boot. If Linda was in the boot and bleeding enough to distribute blood around, why is there no spot where she would have laid inside the boot? You have tiny spots as if it sprayed around yet nothing on the bottom beneath where she would have been laying. Some blood would have settled beneath her you would expect, and luminol would have exposed it right away even if cleaned thoroughly. Imagine the small spots in the boot and how they would have gotten there. That usually happens when a stabbing takes place and blood is flying off the knife. There are other ways those small drops could be spread around but none makes sense if her body was simply laid in the boot after death.
The car was searched twice, then blood suddenly appears on a 3rd search 8 days later? If that did happen the jury should have taken into consideration, that there were 8 days between inspections. Someone could have planted the blood and since it didn't show up in the initial 2 inspections, then I believe it was planted. Who could have planted the blood? The same entity that found no blood in the first 2 inspections. Why would the police call for a 3rd inspection, did they have no faith in their own work? Who had the Renault in their possession and in secluded circumstances such that they could easily have planted blood? The police. How could the police have had access to Lindas blood? If they're responsible for her death. If a body is never found, who is most capable of making that happen? The police.
Did the police kill Linda, under what circumstances and for what reason? I've only heard about this case one hour ago, give me a little time and I'll tell you what happened and whether or not the police are involved.

[fairmaiden]

Its very suspicious that he also claims that if there IS blood in the hooverings, then the blood could still have been planted when he was the only one with the car

[michaellevanic]

Remarkable work of an extraordinary lady.I do admire her

[fairmaiden]

He claimed he was in prison because of the DV allegations BUT....the jury did not hear of these allegations at all

[garrettmeadows]

He's playing the investigor by initially agreeing to a polygraph to string her along. But when it comes down to actually taking the polygraph, he refuses. He played them to get attention.

[rhondamcewananderson]

This show is just amazing! Thanks so much.

[ParkAvenue]

"DID you have anything to do with the murder".... As if he's suddenly going to break down and confess [because]…… why?
What nonsense.

[cruisingkirby.]

I’m only a few minutes into this and I could tell right away that he did it. No one puts a long dragged out. I didn’t do it the way he did. Why didn’t he just say no? And the part about the lie detector test? Are you kidding me?

[lizadoesray]

I am halfway through the video, and my opinion has not wavered. He did it. Women don’t leave their children, without money, without a vehicle, without a trace. Middle-age men don’t go for two hour walks, on a workday, without their phone. He’s guilty.

[relocatetoItaly]

I brushed her to one side she went through a glass panel 😮 yeah right!

[relocatetoItaly]

The timings could be 5 mins off witnesses who saw her do not have a stopwatch in hand. They can be off by quite a few minutes. He could have told her he was dropping off something she wanted and she got in the car to talk to him.

[fairmaiden]

i wonder why he'd borrowed someone else's car that day. So his car wouldn't be seen on CCTV footage?

[sharpedge]

To my mind it makes NO difference that a suspect denies involvement forevermore, because even if guilty, when they first commit the crime, they are surprised not to be apprehended and continue the narrative of non-involvement in order to evade justice, and even if convicted, they stick to it because they, although in prison, are still on the side of non-involvement in order to evade justice, in the end. Its one crime, one point of view all with one goal in mind, to get away with it!!

[fritula]

He is guilty: the domestic violence is the evidence.
He said l had my arm on her and she somehow went through the glass door: