Multiplicative Inverse of 3 (mod 26)

preview_player
Показать описание
How to use Euclid's Algorithm to find a multiplicative inverse of 3 (mod 26)
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

please add brackets when you're arranging/evaluating the terms on the left!

kirstensee
Автор

Thanks for the straightforward video - more tutors need to realise that you need to start with the simplest possible example!!

stuartmeadowcroft
Автор

this video is the best so far. excellent explanation!!

isnintendo
Автор

i am kind of confused where the 9 cam from at about 5:12, if you added 3 + 8, doesn't that equal 11??

supremepizza
Автор

I'm trying to use this method for MI of 2 mod 9 and am just absolutely lost. I only get one formula so I can't do the substitution part of this

luckywitch
Автор

I can't understand where 9 came from in =9x3-1x26

aeiou
Автор

my lord whether we will find modulo maths in discrete maths book ? or number system book ?

kaursingh
Автор

5:16 how did you know that 1 is 9 times 3?

HakarDoski
Автор

Multiplicative inverse of 3 mod 26, no problem. Write out the continued fraction representation of 3/16 = [ 8, 1 2] Underneath write the convergents [1/8, 1/9, 3/26]. The answer is the denominator to the left of the 26, = 9 since 3 * 9 = 1 mod 26..

yifuxero
Автор

Hello! Really appreciate the video! Does this mean that if 7 and 24 weren’t comprime, there would be answer? Because there would be no v and w such that 7v + 24w = 1?

axeldiaz
Автор

Thanks, i did it with 7 mod26 (it's 15) and i ended with this :
3x26-11x7 .

so what should i do with the -11 .

iHaCKeRXZ
Автор

so how can we find the inverse of 26 (mod3) ?

khoadiep
Автор

3v = 1 - 26y, where did you get 1 from ?

maherriyadh
Автор

I think that will be 3v = 26w + 1 instead of 3v = 1 -26w

zahidhasanmozumder
Автор

how do you find the multiplicative inverse of 2

vlamz
Автор

Uh... I may not know what I am talking about, but it appears that the multiplicative inverse of 3 (mod 26) would be 35. I say this as 3(9) = 1(mod 26) >>> 26 + 9 = 35 >>> 3 x 35 = 105 >>> 105 -:- 26 = 4 R 1 >>> therefore 35 = the multiplicative inverse of 3 (mod 26). I saw this method on another video, and I don't fully understand it, but I do somewhat understand it, and I can see that 3 x 35 brings you to "1" on the mod 26 "clock." Yes???? What do you think? So what are we being taught in this video? Seems we are being taught to solve Bezowt's Theorem, but not actually being taught to come up with the multiplicative inverse of 3 (mod 26).

billygraham
Автор

Here's an easier way; With your pocket calculator write the partial quotients of 3/16 = [8, 1, 2]. Underneath, write the convergents = [1/8, 1/9, 3/27]. The answer is 9, the denominator to the left of the rightmost fraction. Rules apply to a mod n where n > a and gcd (a, n ) = 1. Rules differ slightly if you get a continued fraction with an even number of partial quotients. Example: Find 3 mod 58. As before, the partial quotients are [19, 3] and underneath we have [1/19, 3/58]. In the case of an even number of partial quotients, take the difference of rightmost and next denominator to the left = (58 - 19) = 39. Correct since 3 * 39 = 117 which is 1 mod 58.

yifuxero
Автор

This with 7 would be interesting. Since I don't get 1 on the left side for backwars substitution but 2.

muellerhans
Автор

How do you know that it is nine from the fourth solution?

yuanshi
Автор

Where did the 9 come from 🤦🏻‍♀️ahhh thi s is too hard

floatingyunsan
welcome to shbcf.ru