Crispi Altitude VS Lapponia II

preview_player
Показать описание
Here we compare 2 of Crispi's best selling lightweight, non-insulated hunting boot options that are great for early season. They are similar in a lot of ways including excellent breathability, 100% waterproof, lightweight, and the same asymmetrical lacing system for accurate and precise fit.

In short, the Lapponia II will be the lighter weight and slightly more affordable option, and the Crispi Altitude GTX will be a little more durable and comfortable with its dual density polyurethane midsole.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Altitude are BEST boot I have EVER had!!!! BEST flex rating ever. Walk all day and plenty flexible yet plenty stuff. Most comfortable boot I have ever had.

Futurase
Автор

The Altitudes rock!! I love them...great "grab", heal fit, rugged and comfortable.

terryclark
Автор

Great comparison. I ended up with the Lapponia due to the Altitude not being offered with a wide option.

tarheeloutdoorexcursions
Автор

I've been trying to decide between the two 👍

colbykinney
Автор

Every site online says the altitude is a 2.5 flex, not a 3 flex as stated in the video. So which is it?

billintheblind
Автор

It’s the Altitude, not the Attiva, and the flex is 2.5. Who edited this?

LetThemGrow
Автор

If rucking over 35 miles in 3 days, which boot would you choose?

TheTyrider
Автор

Can you do a video on the new Briksdal MTN GTX

haydenmlb
Автор

Please show the cost and different styles of boots

emmettcesspooch
Автор

Like the display would like to see more. Thanks

jenniferreinhard
Автор

Thanks for this review. Been eye balling the lapponias. With the tread being shallower on them, will that be an issue with tread wear?

highcj
Автор

Why talk about the Attiva? You were reviewing the Altitude and Lapponia then went sideways with the Attiva.

allfreedom
Автор

I’m looking for an all around boot for hunting and scouting/hiking in the North East

brent
Автор

what models of crispi are best for wide feet older feet

Eric-mk
Автор

Which boot would you recommend for hunting in the blue ridge mtns

michaeldotson
Автор

Should have did a retake on that one. You gave the wrong flex rating for the altitude and called it by the wrong name several times. 😢

easternadventures
Автор

Altitude looks like a wider fit is that true?

corycbomb
Автор

I was told the laponia soles are very slick in rocky terrain ?… something about crispi using a different sole than in years past …
Any truth to that ?

bradheath
Автор

I always find myself wondering why civilian boots use open hooks for lacing. I think they are terrible and can only see negatives there. Nothing is worse then your boot becomes lose in an absolute critical moment. There is a reason why the military only allows closed hooks. Its a shame, I would never buy these for that reason alone. Outside of that, they look really nice. Maybe some time on the future you will offer closed vs open hooks. Maybe you can explain your motivation for the open hooks? Is that really what people want or there is just nothing else available in this segment?

χχάάοοςς
Автор

These Lapponias are junk. I burned through a pair in 3 months upland hunting. Seams are coming apart, stitching coming out, they leak, just absolutely trash.

DownwindGundogs